You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Are there any plans to add authentication and access control to the Crypto API? If yes, are there any drafts on how they will be integrated? If not, why aren't they included?
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The original incentive for the API design was to support applications in the emerging IoT market, with a crypto API that implemented the best practices in API design and cryptography engineering (see the Design Goals).
In the context of an embedded/IoT system, giving separate applications identity and authentication credentials to access their keystore is actively unhelpful, given the threat models associated with this type of device (see the first assumption in the Security Risk Assessment).
Instead, for systems that provide caller isolation (separate keystores for isolated applications within the system), it is expected that the system provides a secure identity provider service which the cryptoprocessor implementation can use to identify each of the callers, and thus ensure that separate callers have separate views of the keys within the cryptoprocessor.
Finally, there is a difficulty in presenting a generic API in C that expects the caller to provide identity and authentication credentials: what form do these items take, in order to be applicable to a wide range of systems and implementations? - if this was the definition of a specific crypto implementation, then choosing one such format may be acceptable; but this Crypto API expects to be provided by multiple distinct implementations, for which there is no common agreement on what constitutes a caller identity or an authentication/authorisation credential.
Hi,
Are there any plans to add authentication and access control to the Crypto API? If yes, are there any drafts on how they will be integrated? If not, why aren't they included?
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: