Bug: Inline relative links are formatted differently depending on how you create them. #969
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
Hi @krakenhaze 👋 Let me know if that addresses your issue or if there's anything else you want to bring to our attention. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks Claire - I'm a bit confused as to why there are two different ways of doing this. What is the purpose of two different formats for a content reference and a link inserted from the inline toolbar? What's the purpose? And I can't find this mentioned in the help? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
OK, thanks. So the main purpose is to be able to have a link that is editable and one that's not in the Editor, but they both look the same in the published output, apart from the bug where the popup doesn't appear on the content reference link? I suggest also mentioning the two different formats in the help documentation and why they benefit writers. https://docs.gitbook.com/creating-content/formatting/inline#links |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
They both result looking as links in the published output but one can have a different text while the other is bound to have the content title as text.
We'll update our docs to clarify this.