You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we often display a wider interval due to the truncation of the digits up to a certain decimal.
But this leads to some very misleading results:
julia>interval(2.5) # `2.5` is exactly representable
[2.49999, 2.50001]_com
julia>interval(0.1) # `0.1` is not equal to `1//10`
[0.0999999, 0.100001]_com
I think in both cases we should be consistent with how Julia handles showing floats and display [2.5, 2.5]_com and [0.1, 0.1]_com.
If we agree on modifying this behaviour, I suppose it is technically breaking, and will have to wait for 1.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we often display a wider interval due to the truncation of the digits up to a certain decimal.
But this leads to some very misleading results:
I think in both cases we should be consistent with how Julia handles showing floats and display
[2.5, 2.5]_com
and[0.1, 0.1]_com
.If we agree on modifying this behaviour, I suppose it is technically breaking, and will have to wait for 1.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: