Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adjust dem_10m.tif creation to not consider "masked" pixels in downsampling #6

Open
ehusby opened this issue Feb 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Adjust dem_10m.tif creation to not consider "masked" pixels in downsampling #6

ehusby opened this issue Feb 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@ehusby
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@ehusby
Copy link
Contributor

ehusby commented Feb 11, 2022

When producing unmasked strip DEM results, the post-process gdal_translate operation that downsamples the 2m _dem.tif strip result raster to the 10m _dem_10m.tif strip result raster does not attempt to apply the water and cloud components of the _bitmask.tif during the resampling process. Thus, potentially bad data values will mix with good data values in the bilinear resampling procedure.

Is there some way to isolate the two classes of DEM pixels ("valid" and "invalid"/masked) in the downsampling process?
@ehusby ehusby added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed labels Feb 11, 2022
@ehusby ehusby self-assigned this Feb 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ehusby ehusby

Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ehusby