You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, Apache APISIX does not provide packages for Amazon Linux 2023, which prevents users from installing APISIX through package managers like yum or dnf on this platform. This creates an obstacle for users who are running workloads on Amazon Linux 2023 and want to use APISIX as their API gateway.
Current Situation
APISIX packages are available for several Linux distributions
Amazon Linux 2023 is not currently supported
Users on AL2023 cannot install APISIX via yum or dnf
Request
I would like to request official package support for Amazon Linux 2023, allowing users to install APISIX using standard package managers (yum/dnf) on this platform.
Additional Information
Amazon Linux 2023 is the latest version of Amazon's Linux distribution
It uses dnf as its package manager (successor to yum)
Many organizations are migrating to AL2023 for AWS workloads
Impact
Adding support for Amazon Linux 2023 would:
Improve accessibility for AWS users
Simplify deployment in AL2023 environments
Reduce the need for custom installation methods
Align with APISIX's goal of broad platform support
Thank you for considering this feature request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Description
Currently, Apache APISIX does not provide packages for Amazon Linux 2023, which prevents users from installing APISIX through package managers like yum or dnf on this platform. This creates an obstacle for users who are running workloads on Amazon Linux 2023 and want to use APISIX as their API gateway.
Current Situation
Request
I would like to request official package support for Amazon Linux 2023, allowing users to install APISIX using standard package managers (yum/dnf) on this platform.
Additional Information
Impact
Adding support for Amazon Linux 2023 would:
Thank you for considering this feature request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: