-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
COCO panoptic and Sama-COCO masks #11
Comments
to build the step-1 data engine, we did not use sama-coco, but used it for the step2 semi-automatic stage when iterate the panoptic model. |
What do you mean? The second step in the pipeline — questionnaire |
check 3.4 data engine, for step1, we did not use sama-coco data, all the models are trained on COCO, |
Then what does the quote |
Hello! I have a question.
You wrote the following:
We adopt COCO panoptic and Sama-COCO masks (high-quality instance segmentation annotations) as our starting point.
But as far as I understand, in your labeling pipeline, you used in step 1 kMaX-Deeplab and DETA models to get masks and bbox proposals respectively.
Hence, the COCO and Sama-COCO masks are not used, am I right?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: