-
Greetings, I was trying to test out v0.4.0 but keep getting this error after it scans:
This is on Win 11, I tried using oauth and service account with the same result. Not sure how to troubleshoot or proceed, any assistance is appreciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 5 comments 3 replies
-
i'm getting the same thing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, Thanks for reporting this issue. This is an existing issue (#573) that has a pending fix that is not in the current release (0.4.0). The issue arises if you have either no suborgunits or no groups within your organization. You can work around this issue if you are able to temporarily make a suborgunit and/or group before you run ScubaGoggles. Creating the empty suborgunit/group should allow you to avoid the error you’ve been getting. This work around will not be necessary for releases following 0.4.0. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Mike, I agree with you that this is a different issue. Would it be possible to work with me "offline" where I might be able to have you send me a bit of information (which wouldn't be any of your organization's data)? Thanks, Roy |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@nuke101, there is an environment variable that allows you to save the raw API output. Would you mind setting that variable, then review the output to identify which settings are problematic? For example:
Then in Python:
That should print the names of the settings that don't have an associated OU. Assuming the output doesn't contain any sensitive data (it shouldn't but double check), would you mind sending us the offending setting names? Either here or offline with @rlxdev. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi Mike, Thanks for sending this information. We've provided it to Google and are expecting a response from them. Roy |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@nuke101, there is an environment variable that allows you to save the raw API output. Would you mind setting that variable, then review the output to identify which settings are problematic?
For example:
Then in Python:
That should print the names of the settings that don't have an associated OU. Assuming the output doesn't contain any sensitive data (it shouldn't but double check), would you…