Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAQ: How does the Icechunk schema impact s3's partitioned prefix limits #883

Open
jhamman opened this issue Mar 31, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
documentation 📝 Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@jhamman
Copy link
Member

jhamman commented Mar 31, 2025

Problem

As a user looking to get maximal performance out of S3, I may be curious how Icechunk's chunk key schema impacts s3's partitioned prefix limits.

your application can achieve at least 3,500 PUT/COPY/POST/DELETE or 5,500 GET/HEAD requests per second per partitioned Amazon S3 prefix.

Suggested Improvement

Add a section to the docs explaining expected behavior. Bonus to compare it to vanilla Zarr or NetCDF which are even more likely to suffer from the hot-key issue.

@dcherian dcherian added the documentation 📝 Improvements or additions to documentation label Apr 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation 📝 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants