You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This test case verifies the Hue Move functionality of the Color Control Cluster server.
Observed Behavior for TC-CC-3.2:
Step 2c:
After moving hue upwards at 5 units/s starting from 200, the expected hue after 5s should be 225, but the read value is 229.
RPI Test Failure message: The response value (229) is greater than the expected constraint (227).
Question: Where does the constraint value 227 come from?
Step 2d:
After 15s more, the expected hue (300 mod 255) should be 45, but the read value is 53.
RPI Test Pass: The value falls within the 0-227(?) range.
Question: Why is the hue increasing faster than expected?
Additional Observation:
This pattern can also be seen in TC-CC-8.1 for the MoveToHue and StopMoveStep test. In this test:
Starting from 200 and moving up at 5 units/s for 10s should result in 250, but instead, the read value is 254.
Is this an implementation issue, or are these values flexible by design?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
github-actionsbot
changed the title
Unexpected Hue Value in TC-CC-3.2 and TC-CC-8.1 MoveHue Tests
Unexpected Hue Value in TC-CC-3.2 and TC-CC-8.1 MoveHue Tests (CON-1596)
Mar 14, 2025
This is a known TestHarness issue: project-chip/certification-tool#21, should had been fixed in the latest TH version, which TH version are you using? And what is your esp-matter version?
This test case verifies the Hue Move functionality of the Color Control Cluster server.
Observed Behavior for TC-CC-3.2:
Step 2c:
Question: Where does the constraint value 227 come from?
Step 2d:
Question: Why is the hue increasing faster than expected?
Additional Observation:
This pattern can also be seen in TC-CC-8.1 for the MoveToHue and StopMoveStep test. In this test:
Is this an implementation issue, or are these values flexible by design?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: