You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Even though groups are just users without passwords in iRODS, it seems to me that it would be nice to keep the iRODSGroup and iRODSUser types separated completely by not allowing iRODSUsers of type rodsgroup or iRODSGroups of any type other than rodsgroup.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
And presumably, to go along with that, some future version of iRODS will also make a stronger distinction between users and groups, with such queries as this one returning zero rows.
Even though groups are just users without passwords in iRODS, it seems to me that it would be nice to keep the
iRODSGroup
andiRODSUser
types separated completely by not allowingiRODSUser
s of typerodsgroup
oriRODSGroup
s of any type other thanrodsgroup
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: