You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The variable ECoo.y of the model Buildings.ThermalZones.EnergyPlus_9_6_0.Examples.SmallOffice.IdealHeatingCoolingWinter fails the verification vs the Dymola reference file.
That variables integrates the sum of the five outputs coo[x].conPID.y in coo block, each one multiplied by a gain, and the signals coo[x].conPID.y pass the verification.
The question here is to decide if the accumulation of the errors of the signals coo[x].conPID.y (multiplied by the relevant gains) shall or not be verified vs the Dymola reference file, maybe this verification is too hard to get by using different compilers and solvers.
The variable
ECoo.y of
the modelBuildings.ThermalZones.EnergyPlus_9_6_0.Examples.SmallOffice.IdealHeatingCoolingWinter
fails the verification vs the Dymola reference file.That variables integrates the sum of the five outputs
coo[x].conPID.y
in coo block, each one multiplied by a gain, and the signalscoo[x].conPID.y
pass the verification.Detailed analysis is available in OpenModelica/OpenModelica#12809
The question here is to decide if the accumulation of the errors of the signals
coo[x].conPID.y
(multiplied by the relevant gains) shall or not be verified vs the Dymola reference file, maybe this verification is too hard to get by using different compilers and solvers.Keeping @casella in the loop.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: