Create inscriptions or extensions on existing pump.fun SPL token SOLFUNMEME

[jmikedupont2]

talking with perplexity
Create inscriptions or extensions on existing pump.fun SPL token
Answer
Unfortunately, it is not possible to add extensions or inscriptions to existing pump.fun SPL tokens. Token extensions, including those for pump.fun tokens, must be set up when the token is initially created and cannot be added afterwards14.

For pump.fun tokens specifically:

All pump.fun tokens use the same update authority address (TSLvdd1pWpHVjahSpsvCXUbgwsL3JAcvokwaKt1eokM)5.

The creators field for pump.fun tokens is null5.

pump.fun uses a secure token launching system to ensure created tokens are safe to trade7.

If you want to create a new token with extensions on Solana, you would need to use the Token-2022 program (also called SPL Token-2022) when minting the token12. This allows you to enable various extensions like transfer fees, non-transferable status, metadata, and more at the time of creation4.

For existing tokens, the only option would be to create a new token with the desired extensions and potentially set up a migration process for holders of the original token. However, this is not possible within the pump.fun ecosystem, which has its own token creation and management system78.

Token Metadata with Token Extensions on Solana - YouTube
Token Metadata with Token Extensions on Solana - YouTube
Watch

cryptopolitan.com

blogs.shyft.to

blogs.shyft.to
squads.so
kucoin.com
blog.quicknode.com
View More
we can use magic numbers in the transaction amounts as carried data
Answer
Ah, I see what you're getting at. You're right, and that's quite an innovative approach. Using specific transaction amounts as a form of data carrier is indeed possible and has been used in various blockchain systems. This technique is sometimes referred to as "colored coins" or "semantic transactions." Here's how this could work with pump.fun SPL tokens:

Using Transaction Amounts as Data Carriers
Precision of Amounts: pump.fun tokens typically have 9 decimal places of precision. This gives a lot of room for encoding information in the fractional part of the amount.

Magic Numbers: You could use specific patterns in the last few decimal places to encode data. For example:

1.000000001 could mean one thing

1.000000002 could mean another

1.000000420 could represent a specific message or command

Data Encoding: You could potentially encode short messages, commands, or identifiers in these "magic numbers."

Considerations and Limitations
Limited Space: You're limited by the token's decimal precision. With 9 decimal places, you have a maximum of 999,999,999 possible values to work with.

Interpretation: You'd need an off-chain system to interpret these magic numbers and extract the embedded data or meaning.

Network Fees: Be aware that sending many small transactions with specific amounts might incur more fees than standard usage.

Visibility: This method is not private. The transaction amounts are visible on the blockchain, so any encoded data is also public.

Compliance: Ensure this usage doesn't violate any terms of service for pump.fun or regulatory requirements.

Implementation Ideas
Simple Commands: Use the last 3 digits for command codes (e.g., 1.000000123 could mean "activate feature X").

Short Messages: Encode ASCII characters in groups of 3 digits (e.g., 1.065078084 could represent "ATM").

Identifiers: Use the fractional part to represent unique IDs for off-chain data or actions.

Remember, while this method is clever and can work, it's not an official feature of pump.fun or Solana. It's a creative use of the existing system. Always test thoroughly and consider the implications before implementing such a system in a production environment.

we can use elliptic curves on top of colored transactions, also do the solana tranactions not allow for any metadata to be added?
Answer
You're right that elliptic curves can be used in conjunction with colored transactions, but there are some important considerations and limitations to keep in mind, especially when it comes to Solana transactions.

Regarding Solana transactions and metadata:

Solana transactions have a strict size limit of 1232 bytes8. This severely restricts the amount of additional data that can be included in a single transaction.

Solana doesn't have a built-in metadata field for transactions like some other blockchains do. Instead, any additional data must be included as part of the instruction data6.

To work around the size limitation, developers have implemented "chunking" methods, where large amounts of data are split across multiple transactions6. This allows for processing of larger instructions, but it's more complex to implement and manage.

Given these constraints, here's how you might approach combining elliptic curves with colored transactions on Solana:

Elliptic Curves and Colored Transactions
Encoding Data: You could use elliptic curve points to encode additional information within the transaction amounts, similar to the colored coins concept1. This would allow you to embed data without increasing the transaction size significantly.

Cryptographic Signatures: Elliptic curve cryptography could be used to create compact signatures for the colored transaction data, ensuring its integrity and authenticity5.

Data Compression: Given Solana's size limitations, you might need to use efficient data compression techniques when encoding information using elliptic curves.

Workarounds for Solana's Limitations
Instruction Data: Include your colored transaction data within the instruction data of Solana transactions. This is where you'd typically put any custom data for your program6.

Chunking: For larger amounts of data, implement a chunking system where data is split across multiple transactions and reassembled by your program6.

Off-chain Storage: Store larger datasets off-chain and only include references or hashes in the on-chain transactions. This could be combined with elliptic curve techniques for data integrity.

Remember that while these approaches are technically possible, they come with increased complexity and potential performance implications. Always consider the trade-offs between data richness and transaction efficiency when designing your Solana programs.

9 sources

so it would be possible to create a new contract that would store data and then we can somehow burn a solfunmeme token to create it.
Answer
Yes, it would be possible to create a new contract that stores data and link it to burning solfunmeme tokens. Here's how this could work:

Create a new Solana program (smart contract) that handles data storage1. This program would:

Initialize data accounts to store arbitrary data as bytes

Manage metadata for the stored data in separate PDA (Program Derived Address) accounts

Implement a token burning mechanism for solfunmeme tokens26. This would involve:

Using the createBurnCheckedInstruction from the SPL Token program

Specifying the amount of solfunmeme tokens to burn

Link the data storage and token burning:

In your new program, create an instruction that combines burning solfunmeme tokens with creating a new data storage account

This instruction would first burn the specified amount of tokens, then create and initialize the data storage account

Deploy your program to the Solana blockchain3.

To use this system, users would need to:

Approve the burning of their solfunmeme tokens

Provide the data they want to store

Call your program's instruction to execute the burn and data storage in a single transaction

Remember that Solana has a transaction size limit of 1232 bytes2, so for larger amounts of data, you may need to implement a chunking system or store data references on-chain with the actual data off-chain.

This approach creates a novel use case for solfunmeme tokens, potentially increasing their utility and value. However, ensure you comply with all relevant regulations and the terms of service for the solfunmeme token when implementing such a system.

forum.solana.com

blog.chain.link

serokell.io

solulab.com
rapidinnovation.io
helius.dev
View More
we could batch those burnings into daily zkp rollups that prove that the new data contains the old data but in a smaller form like mina coin
Answer
Your idea of batching token burnings into daily zkSNARK rollups similar to Mina Protocol's approach is an innovative concept that could potentially enhance the efficiency of token burning on Solana. Here's how this could work:

Daily Batching: Instead of processing each token burn individually, the burns would be collected and batched over a 24-hour period5.

zkSNARK Proofs: At the end of each day, a zkSNARK proof would be generated. This proof would demonstrate that:

All collected burn transactions are valid

The new state (post-burning) correctly reflects the changes from the previous state

No unauthorized burns occurred

Compressed State: Similar to Mina Protocol, this approach would allow for a compressed representation of the burn state48. Instead of storing all individual burn transactions, only the proof and the final state would be needed.

Verification: Nodes could quickly verify the zkSNARK proof without needing to process each individual burn transaction2.

Constant Size: Like Mina's 22kB blockchain, this system could maintain a relatively constant size for burn data, regardless of the number of burn transactions4.

Implementation Considerations:

Solana Integration: This system would need to be carefully integrated with Solana's existing architecture and the SPL Token program13.

Proof Generation: A reliable system for generating daily zkSNARK proofs would be required, potentially run by validators or a dedicated service.

Smart Contract: A new smart contract would be needed to handle the batched burns and interact with the zkSNARK proofs3.

User Experience: The burning interface for users could remain similar to existing tools, with the batching and proof generation happening behind the scenes57.

This approach could significantly reduce the on-chain storage and computation required for token burning, while still maintaining the security and verifiability of the process. However, it would require substantial development effort and careful consideration of Solana's specific architecture and performance characteristics.

Related
What technologies are shaping the future of enterprise storage solutions?
Sponsored
How does Mina Protocol achieve succinct blockchain storage
What are the main benefits of using Mina Protocol for blockchain data
How does token burning impact the overall supply of a cryptocurrency
What are the steps to create a burn instruction for SPL tokens on Solana
How does the Solana SPL token program handle token burning

youtube.com
youtube.com
WatchSponsored

[jmikedupont2]

https://medium.com/@buildwithbhavya/the-math-behind-pump-fun-b58fdb30ed77
https://read.cryptodatabytes.com/p/a-guide-to-solana-token2022-token
https://www.quicknode.com/guides/solana-development/anchor/token-2022
https://read.cryptodatabytes.com/p/a-guide-to-solana-token2022-token

[jmikedupont2]

claude : Based on the GitHub issue discussion, here's a summary of the key points about creating inscriptions or extensions for pump.fun SPL tokens on Solana:

1. Initial Problem: The discussion started with whether it's possible to add extensions or inscriptions to existing pump.fun SPL tokens, which was determined to not be directly possible since token extensions must be set up at creation.

2. Alternative Approaches Discussed:

• Using "magic numbers" in transaction amounts as a data carrier
• Leveraging elliptic curves with colored transactions
• Creating a new contract for data storage linked to token burning
• Implementing daily zkSNARK rollups for batching token burns

3. Most Promising Solution Proposed:
   The discussion evolved toward a sophisticated approach combining:

• A new smart contract for data storage
• Token burning mechanism for solfunmeme tokens
• Batching burns into daily zkSNARK rollups
• Compressed state representation similar to Mina Protocol

4. Technical Constraints Identified:

• Solana's transaction size limit of 1232 bytes
• Limited metadata capabilities in Solana transactions
• Need for efficient data compression techniques
• Consideration of blockchain storage optimization

The discussion shows an evolution from a simple question about token extensions to exploring complex technical solutions involving zero-knowledge proofs and state compression techniques.

[jmikedupont2]

https://codeberg.org/introspector/SOLFUNMEME/issues/4#issuecomment-2826348