Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
One way would be:
One problem that remains is that the way we handle crowding PRs currently is messy, because we got too much translations at once, and it's not easy to validate. With a quick read at github action for crowdin it may be possible to have a better strategy:
I must experiment with this, but I think it could be a huge improvement also for other projects. @teolemon would you agree that for contents the best would be:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Some path to investigate? Crowdin CMS connectors managing minor content updatesSome Crowdin CMS connectors seem to manage minor content updates, suggesting you don't have to reload the whole page when there is a small fix. At least I have found the following connectors/CMS do this:
It seems that all these CMSs are headless. What kind of contents Crowdin is able to translate with ease?How Crowdin is able to translate contents in a fine grain approach (per paragraphs, blocs, etc.)? Then find the collection of tools allowing to produce this kind of format, and generate web contents based on it. The web content management approachSome web tools allow to build rich web layout based on flat files. It might be possible to export these contents to feed Crowdin. Eg. to investigate:
What are the main needs for editors?The main needs should be listed to select/reject some tools:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We want contents on Open Food Facts to be updated more quickly and to be more attractive.
For that we need a tool that enables content creators to do it easily. We still need contents to be massively translated.
@4nt0ineB has done a work to have contents for open food facts in wordpress.
The plan was to use WPML with Crowdin to translate the contents.
But as we tested it, it does not fit our needs:
We want to explore further more what to do.
Possible ideas:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions