Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bug: NANO is not very *durable* #4

Open
linden opened this issue Jan 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Bug: NANO is not very *durable* #4

linden opened this issue Jan 15, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@linden
Copy link
Collaborator

linden commented Jan 15, 2022

Problem
Currently when running Solitude's test, we've needed to implement timeouts since on lower spec'd systems NANO get's overloaded and instead of queueing it just closes the socket.

Fix
Set up a queueing system, possibly even a custom SAMv3 response (i.e. returning WAIT when server is overloaded).
@linden linden changed the title Bug: NANO is not very "durable". Bug: NANO is not very *durable* Jan 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@linden