You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a wire that should connect two pins on the same connector, and I discovered the "loops" feature. However, when I attempted to use it, I got this error:
exception: Unknown loop pin "6" for connector "P4601"!
From some experimentation, it appears that the loops lists only understands pin numbers, not pin labels? Is this intentional? It seems to go against the pattern used everywhere else where you can use numbers and labels interchangeably.
(This feature also seems a bit half-baked, honestly. I would need to specify the color and gauge of the wire used, so I'd need to make up a cable section for it anyway so these can be specified.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree the current loops feature has limitations. Possible improvements are discussed in several issues, e.g. #48, #224 (comment), #286, #350, and #439.
I have a wire that should connect two pins on the same connector, and I discovered the "loops" feature. However, when I attempted to use it, I got this error:
From some experimentation, it appears that the loops lists only understands pin numbers, not pin labels? Is this intentional? It seems to go against the pattern used everywhere else where you can use numbers and labels interchangeably.
(This feature also seems a bit half-baked, honestly. I would need to specify the color and gauge of the wire used, so I'd need to make up a cable section for it anyway so these can be specified.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: