-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
feat(genai): Sample/textgen part3 #4170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Here is the summary of changes. You are about to add 2 region tags.
This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Guiners, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces new Node.js samples for Google Cloud's Generative AI, specifically focusing on advanced text generation capabilities. It adds examples for generating text from PDF documents and from multiple local image inputs, demonstrating how to interact with the Gemini model for these tasks.
Highlights
- New Text Generation Sample (PDF): Introduces a new sample (
textgen-code-with-pdf.js
) demonstrating how to generate text content from a PDF file using the Gemini model. - New Text Generation Sample (Multi-Image): Adds a new sample (
textgen-with-multi-local-img.js
) showcasing text generation from multiple local image inputs, converting images to base64 for API calls. - Corresponding Tests: Includes new test files (
textgen-code-with-pdf.test.js
andtextgen-with-multi-local-img.test.js
) to validate the functionality of the newly added text generation samples.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces two new GenAI samples for text generation, one using a PDF and another with multiple local images, along with their corresponding tests. The sample code is well-structured. I've identified a couple of minor issues in the test files, including an incorrect test description and unnecessary async
keywords on describe
blocks, which should be addressed to improve code quality and clarity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Description
Fixes #
Note: Before submitting a pull request, please open an issue for discussion if you are not associated with Google.
Checklist
npm test
(see Testing)npm run lint
(see Style)GoogleCloudPlatform/nodejs-docs-samples
. Not a fork.