-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 554
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge develop up to 2024-01-11 to dev/ufs-weather-model #1342
Merge develop up to 2024-01-11 to dev/ufs-weather-model #1342
Conversation
…ange UST scale factor (NOAA-EMC#1050)
…ile instead of inp file (NOAA-EMC#1070)
…n binary and ascii format using switch ASCII. (NOAA-EMC#1089)
…efined in w3odatmd (size=15). Also, defined unit numbers for NDS(14) and NDS(15). (NOAA-EMC#1098)
… DIA in NL1 or NL2. (NOAA-EMC#1083)
Conflicts: .github/workflows/intel.yml model/src/w3initmd.F90 model/src/w3iogomd.F90 model/src/w3ounfmetamd.F90
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes have been reviewed. Build test in standalone and within the ufs-wm structure have been passed successfully. I approve this PR
d61564b
into
NOAA-EMC:dev/ufs-weather-model
I think UFSWM would prefer we finish our testing before this merging takes place, in case something happens over there and we need to revert something with WW3. |
This reverts commit d61564b.
@BrianCurtis-NOAA will revert this then. |
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA The previous WW3_input_data was 20240214, so I just wanted to verify that we are going back in time with 20240111 ? |
No need to right now, let's see how testing goes first. |
Feel free to move it to a different date. It was my nomenclature and is not consistent with the way the other inputs are numbered. |
How should we number it? 20250114 ? Will that hurt/break anything? The number would be set based on when the new data will be "viable" for UFSWM and that date forward. |
@BrianCurtis-NOAA that works! Sorry for this oversight on my part, I saw it but then forgot about it. This will not hurt anything - we just need to make sure we point to the correct date in rt.sh. |
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA Did you mean to merge dev/ufs-weather-model prior to the UWM PR being committed? |
Pull Request Summary
Merge develop branch up to commit date on 2024-01-11 to dev/ufs-weather-model
Description
Merge develop branch up to commit date on 2024-01-11 to dev/ufs-weather-model . This is the first in a sequence of PRs updating dev/ufs-weather-model with updates from develop.
Issue(s) addressed
None
Commit Message
Merge develop up to 2024-01-11 to dev/ufs-weather-model
Check list
Testing