Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SL-ONLY] BaseApplication Init refactor #347

Conversation

lpbeliveau-silabs
Copy link
Contributor

Cherry-pick of the changes in CSA + Traces for end of bootup.


Testing

Build and ran on series2/3 917

@lpbeliveau-silabs lpbeliveau-silabs requested a review from a team as a code owner March 14, 2025 19:49
@jmartinez-silabs jmartinez-silabs added the sl-only This TAG indicates that this commit is a silabs-specific commit that cannot be upstream to CSA. label Mar 14, 2025
@lpbeliveau-silabs lpbeliveau-silabs force-pushed the feature/base_app_refactor branch from 7732c88 to e7f6d4b Compare March 14, 2025 20:14

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
ksperling-apple Karsten Sperling
* Refactor of BaseApplication to reduce code copied accross examples

* Removed unused method

* Update examples/platform/silabs/BaseApplication.h

Co-authored-by: Mathieu Kardous <84793247+mkardous-silabs@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update examples/platform/silabs/BaseApplication.h

* Update examples/platform/silabs/BaseApplication.h

* Update examples/platform/silabs/BaseApplication.h

---------

Co-authored-by: Mathieu Kardous <84793247+mkardous-silabs@users.noreply.github.com>
@lpbeliveau-silabs lpbeliveau-silabs force-pushed the feature/base_app_refactor branch from e7f6d4b to a9ab8f3 Compare March 14, 2025 20:45
@mkardous-silabs mkardous-silabs merged commit 40b1838 into SiliconLabsSoftware:release_2.6-1.4 Mar 14, 2025
51 of 53 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
sl-only This TAG indicates that this commit is a silabs-specific commit that cannot be upstream to CSA.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants