-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
zpc: Fix tests #46
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
Comments
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Feb 25, 2025
…otocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 Docs should be regenerated from sources, but not stored along sources. More cleanup might be desirable for 1.7. Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 6, 2025
…otocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 Docs should be regenerated from sources, but not stored along sources. More cleanup might be desirable for 1.7. Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2025
…otocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 Docs should be regenerated from sources, but not stored along sources. More cleanup might be desirable for 1.7. Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This test was previously bypassed, it is now working as expected. The reason it was failing is because mktime use timezone to set the tm structure that will be returned to the next step of step. Setting timezone to UTC (+0) solves the problem Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This test was previously bypassed, it is now working as expected. The reason it was failing is because mktime use timezone to set the tm structure that will be returned to the next step of step. Setting timezone to UTC (+0) solves the problem Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#69 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This test was previously bypassed, it is now working as expected. The reason it was failing is because mktime use timezone to set the tm structure that will be returned to the next step of step. Setting timezone to UTC (+0) solves the problem Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#69 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
Not this is not latest version but it aligned to the version used at zwa, may unify-core align to it and synchronize all projects accordingly, or reconsider the archtecture. Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#60 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
…otocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 Docs should be regenerated from sources, but not stored along sources. More cleanup might be desirable for 1.7. Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
…: Removed as not part of z-wave-protocol-controller This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#36 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
…092898 (SiliconLabsSoftware#59)" This reverts commit 9865caa. Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#46
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 17, 2025
…est SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
#46 This test was previously bypassed, it is now working as expected. The reason it was failing is because mktime use timezone to set the tm structure that will be returned to the next step of step. Setting timezone to UTC (+0) solves the problem Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: #46 Origin: #69 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
Not this is not latest version but it aligned to the version used at zwa, may unify-core align to it and synchronize all projects accordingly, or reconsider the archtecture. Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#60 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
…otocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 Docs should be regenerated from sources, but not stored along sources. More cleanup might be desirable for 1.7. Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
…: Removed as not part of z-wave-protocol-controller This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#36 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
…092898 (SiliconLabsSoftware#59)" This reverts commit 9865caa. Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#46
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
…est SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
Not this is not latest version but it aligned to the version used at zwa, may unify-core align to it and synchronize all projects accordingly, or reconsider the archtecture. Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#60 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2025
…otocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#46 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 Docs should be regenerated from sources, but not stored along sources. More cleanup might be desirable for 1.7. Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…protocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#60 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#60 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…ntroller SiliconLabsSoftware#55 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#55 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…ller SiliconLabsSoftware#55 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#55 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…est SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…5.3-g9d092898" SiliconLabsSoftware#60 This reverts commit 9865caa. Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#36 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…Software#60 Patches from unify may land elsewhere Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#36 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#55 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#36 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#55 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…libs2/TestFramework/cmock: Removed as not part of z-wave-protocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#60 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#60 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…protocol-controller SiliconLabsSoftware#60 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#60 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…ntroller SiliconLabsSoftware#55 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#55 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…ller SiliconLabsSoftware#55 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug: SiliconLabsSoftware#55 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…est SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
to rzr/z-wave-protocol-controller
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Origin: SiliconLabsSoftware#70 Relate-to: SiliconLabsSoftware#46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
Not this is not latest version but it aligned to the version used at zwa, may unify-core align to it and synchronize all projects accordingly, or reconsider the architecture. Since UnifySDK also depends on CMock, indirect dep will be privileged, May those lines be removed in later cleanup changes. Origin: #70 Bug-SiliconLabsSoftware: #60 Relate-to: #46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…otocol-controller #46 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 Docs should be regenerated from sources, but not stored along sources. More cleanup might be desirable for 1.7. Origin: #70 Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Relate-to: #46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…: Removed as not part of z-wave-protocol-controller #60 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: #70 Bug: #46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…libs2/TestFramework/cmock: Removed as not part of z-wave-protocol-controller #60 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: #70 Bug: #60 Relate-to: #46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…protocol-controller #60 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: #70 Bug: #60 Relate-to: #46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…ntroller #55 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: #70 Bug: #55 Relate-to: #46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
rzr
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 19, 2025
…ller #55 This component is maintained at UnifySDK (v1.7+ aka core), This change deduplicate code, to ensure a single source of truth and enable a more sustainable developement model without overhead of monorepo. This change may be not atomic, but has been done in a way one component could be reverted if it justify a downstream (double) maintainance or experimental works. For the record this component was imported from: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.6.0 If this component should be re-introduced it would be preferable to consider the code where it is maintained eg: https://github.com/SiliconLabs/UnifySDK/releases/tag/ver_1.7.0 (or later) Bug-SiliconLabs: SWPROT-8953 Origin: #70 Bug: #55 Relate-to: #46 Signed-off-by: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@silabs.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Related tasks:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: