feat: snowman/adaptor package
#3866
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR has become stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Adding the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why this should be merged
The
block.ChainVMandsnowman.Blockinterfaces typically require that theBlockimplementation knows about the VM, which is a bit clunky. This unclunks things.How this works
The
Verify(),Accept(), andReject()methods are moved onto a genericChainVM[B]interface, whereBis required to implement all other methods ofsnowman.Block. A minimal adaptor converts fromadaptor.ChainVMtoblock.ChainVM.How this was tested
TBD
Need to be documented in RELEASES.md?
No