Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix missing newline. #1067

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2024
Merged

Fix missing newline. #1067

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2024

Conversation

jzmaddock
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6f81305) 85.22% compared to head (9f5e81d) 85.24%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1067      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    85.22%   85.24%   +0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          875      875              
  Lines        66568    66568              
===========================================
+ Hits         56733    56745      +12     
+ Misses        9835     9823      -12     
Files Coverage Δ
include/boost/math/optimization/detail/common.hpp 26.96% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 6f81305...9f5e81d. Read the comment docs.

@jzmaddock jzmaddock merged commit e06b1b7 into develop Jan 21, 2024
67 checks passed
@NAThompson
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @jzmaddock ! Quick question: Do you have a .clang-format you like so we can automate some of these problems away?

@NAThompson NAThompson deleted the opt_newline branch January 21, 2024 18:32
@jzmaddock
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Quick question: Do you have a .clang-format you like so we can automate some of these problems away?

Sorry no, I have found it can make a right mess of things if you're not careful, haven't tried it recently though...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants