Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Organize TAG Security publications into table format #1272

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

anvega
Copy link
Contributor

@anvega anvega commented Jun 11, 2024

This PR organizes the contents of the TAG Security publications into a structured table format for easier reference and access. Each publication is categorized and linked, improving the readability and usability of the documentation.

  • Added a table listing all the publications and resources produced by TAG Security.
  • Included descriptions, formats, and links for each publication.

The previous format was less structured, making it difficult to quickly locate specific publications and resources. By organizing the content into tables, we enhance the user experience and facilitate easier navigation. This will also make it easier to pull to the site.

Signed-off-by: Andrés Vega <av@messier42.com>

Signed-off-by: Andrés Vega <av@messier42.com>
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Deploy Preview for tag-security ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a2fbde8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/tag-security/deploys/6668935bfccc7b00082fe870
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1272--tag-security.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@anvega anvega merged commit e494d10 into main Jun 11, 2024
11 checks passed
@anvega anvega deleted the anvega-publications branch June 20, 2024 03:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants