docs: fix function name and comment #23372
Conversation
Signed-off-by: luchenhan <hanluchen@aliyun.com>
luchenhan
requested review from
JulianToledano,
raynaudoe,
a team and
julienrbrt
as code owners
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request encompasses changes across three different files, focusing on renaming functions and improving documentation clarity. In Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Decoder
participant Device
Client->>Decoder: Request transaction decoding
Decoder->>Decoder: Select decoding method (TEXT)
Decoder->>Device: Retrieve and verify transaction
Device-->>Decoder: Return decoded transaction
Decoder-->>Client: Provide decoded transaction
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
crypto/ledger/ledger_secp256k1.go (1)
Line range hint
335-340: LGTM! Clear and accurate documentation update.The renaming to
getPubKeyAddrSafeand the updated comment block effectively communicate the security implications and user interaction requirements.Consider adding a cross-reference to the unsafe variant
getPubKeyUnsafein the documentation to help developers make an informed choice between the two functions:// getPubKeyAddrSafe reads the pubkey and the address from a ledger device. // This function is marked as Safe as it will require user confirmation and -// account and index will be shown in the device. +// account and index will be shown in the device. For cases where user confirmation +// is not required, see getPubKeyUnsafe.client/v2/tx/encoder.go (1)
Line range hint
124-125: Update variable name to match TEXT format.The variable name
jsonTxis misleading as it now holds TEXT format data.- jsonTx := new(txv1beta1.Tx) + textTx := new(txv1beta1.Tx)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
baseapp/abci_test.go(1 hunks)client/v2/tx/encoder.go(1 hunks)crypto/ledger/ledger_secp256k1.go(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- baseapp/abci_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
crypto/ledger/ledger_secp256k1.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
client/v2/tx/encoder.go (1)
Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: test-system-v2
- GitHub Check: Analyze
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (1)
client/v2/tx/encoder.go (1)
Line range hint
118-123: LGTM! Clear function name update reflecting the format change.The renaming from
decodeJsonTxtodecodeTextTxaccurately represents the change in transaction decoding format.
Description
fix function name and comment
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeCHANGELOG.mdReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
baseapp/abci_test.goto improve clarity about state reset between callsRefactor
client/v2/tx/encoder.gofrom JSON to TEXT formatcrypto/ledger/ledger_secp256k1.goto emphasize safe user confirmation processThese changes focus on improving code readability and documentation without altering core functionality.