-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update PIE #5143
update PIE #5143
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
This reverts commit 28b0ce6.
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
what was the bug in the previous code? |
it was not handling the '?' characters properly |
u can check with this test case:
|
wait so that sol literally didn't ac? omg |
yes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Sosuke23 can u send proof of AC? j to make sure
how do u submit to past srm contest? |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
if u manually tested most TCs its PROBABLY fine, maybe consider finding another sol and stresstesting it |
the previous dp solution is correct so I tested all three solutions together |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
@envyaims can you confirm the time complexity of second implementation of |
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
baller
Place an "x" in the corresponding checkbox if it is done or does not apply to this pull request.
closes: #4702
there was a typo and the previous code was wrong for some test cases so I corrected it.
the previous problem link was not working so I changed it to the archive one