You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We want machine names of environments to be consistent throughout usage of Next Build so that we know we are always using the correct environment.
Description or Additional Context
This PR was created because of a mismatch between the name of the production environment within Next Build and the value that was being passed to it: department-of-veterans-affairs/next-build#863
This highlighted a problem: the environment values that are passed in by the build script - prodstaging etc - do not reflect what Next Build itself uses internally - vagovprod, vagovstaging etc.
Next Build should be examined and all references to environment should be made consistent. At a minimum the above indicates that the values passed by the build script need to change to the vagov versions. I'm of the opinion that we should use the vagov versions everywhere, since this is how other teams designate those environments. This is open to discussion however.
Steps for Implementation
Acceptance Criteria
Testable_Outcome_X
Testable_Outcome_Y
Testable_Outcome_Z
Requires design review
Requires accessibility review
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
User Story or Problem Statement
We want machine names of environments to be consistent throughout usage of Next Build so that we know we are always using the correct environment.
Description or Additional Context
This PR was created because of a mismatch between the name of the production environment within Next Build and the value that was being passed to it: department-of-veterans-affairs/next-build#863
This highlighted a problem: the environment values that are passed in by the build script -
prod
staging
etc - do not reflect what Next Build itself uses internally -vagovprod
,vagovstaging
etc.Next Build should be examined and all references to environment should be made consistent. At a minimum the above indicates that the values passed by the build script need to change to the
vagov
versions. I'm of the opinion that we should use thevagov
versions everywhere, since this is how other teams designate those environments. This is open to discussion however.Steps for Implementation
Acceptance Criteria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: