-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release/9.0] Fixing Analyzer issues, servicing, Part 2: Actual Fixes #13182
base: servicing/RefactorAnalyzerTests9.0Rel
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[release/9.0] Fixing Analyzer issues, servicing, Part 2: Actual Fixes #13182
Conversation
19e5925
to
fe3dd24
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release/9.0 #13182 +/- ##
=====================================================
- Coverage 74.83821% 74.79265% -0.04557%
=====================================================
Files 3022 2997 -25
Lines 630460 629261 -1199
Branches 46797 46742 -55
=====================================================
- Hits 471825 470641 -1184
- Misses 155247 155258 +11
+ Partials 3388 3362 -26
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
…ionConfiguration. * Addresses 13205, 13206, 13207, 13208.
c6effd1
to
7b2aaa0
Compare
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ | |||
<AllowUnsafeBlocks>true</AllowUnsafeBlocks> | |||
<EnableUnsafeBinaryFormatterSerialization>true</EnableUnsafeBinaryFormatterSerialization> | |||
<GenerateResourceWarnOnBinaryFormatterUse>false</GenerateResourceWarnOnBinaryFormatterUse> | |||
<IsTestUtilityProject>true</IsTestUtilityProject> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is this property needed? Do we not set shipping/notshipping properties based on the Test suffix?
Part 2 of servicing Analyzer fixes back to release/9.0.
This PR contains the actual fixes along with the added tests based on the back ported infrastructure from .NET 10.
See Part 1, Changing the Infrastructure, here:
#13072
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow
Please note, that these fixes have been done and checked, so the respective other language applied, both in C# and Visual Basic, and then Unit Tests had been added to cover those scenarios.
From here, once these are OK'ed, we will back-port them (again, if you will, because the originally came from .NET 10 main), to .NET 10, and the new Clipboard Analyzer's tests will then be updated to integrate into the new test infra.
And after that, they can go into main/net10.