Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "[8.17] Update Fleet docs for new 'read' access roles (backport #1697)" #1720

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

kilfoyle
Copy link
Contributor

@kilfoyle kilfoyle commented Mar 4, 2025

Reverts #1702 which added the Fleet "read only" access roles to the 8.17 docs.

As discussed in #1719, the read-only access feature is present in the UI but not actually available/supported until 8.18, so these changes should be reverted in 8.17.

Closes: #1719

@kilfoyle kilfoyle requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2025 13:54
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 4, 2025

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

Copy link
Member

@nchaulet nchaulet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, LGTM 🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@karenzone karenzone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kilfoyle kilfoyle merged commit 3473727 into 8.17 Mar 4, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants