-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
#2412 - User can't correctly save (or make a layout) to RDF/RXN reaction several products or with separate positioned molecules #2717
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -822,5 +824,234 @@ namespace indigo | |||
float _d; | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
inline bool isPointInPolygon(const Vec2f& p, const std::vector<Vec2f>& poly) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need more comments.
Also no need to calculate x if both vertices has x > px
So I suggest something like
inline bool isPointInPolygon(const Vec2f& p, const std::vector<Vec2f>& poly)
{
// Ray casting algorithm
bool in = false;
for (size_t i = 0, n = poly.size(); i < n; ++i)
{
size_t j = (i + 1) % n;
if (((poly[i].y > p.y) != (poly[j].y > p.y)) && // point y between vertices and
(((p.x > poly[i].x) && (p.x < poly[j].x)) || // both vertices are at right of point or edge is at right of point
(p.x < (poly[i].x + (p.y - poly[i].y) * (poly[j].x - poly[i].x) / (poly[j].y - poly[i].y))))) // py < (py-y0)*dx/dy
in = !in;
}
return in;
}
return result; | ||
} | ||
|
||
inline float convexPolygonArea(const std::vector<Vec2f>& poly) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please add comment that this is "Shoelace formula - triangle form"
return result; | ||
} | ||
|
||
inline bool isPointInConvexPolygon(const Vec2f& p, const std::vector<Vec2f>& poly) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like this function computation is more complex tnan isPointInPolygon.
For convex polygon in most cases no edge crossing computation need - edge will be at left or at right from point.
Most complex case need cross calculation for one edge.
return std::abs(area) * 0.5f; | ||
} | ||
|
||
inline bool isInside(const Vec2f& edgeStart, const Vec2f& edgeEnd, const Vec2f& point) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should be named isNormalNegative, and comment about "check sign of normal to (edgeStart,edgeEnd),(edgeStart,point)" will be usefull
@@ -822,5 +824,234 @@ namespace indigo | |||
float _d; | |||
}; | |||
|
|||
inline bool isPointInPolygon(const Vec2f& p, const std::vector<Vec2f>& poly) | |||
{ | |||
bool in = false; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||
inline bool convexPolygonsIntersect(const std::vector<Vec2f>& poly1, const std::vector<Vec2f>& poly2) | ||
{ | ||
auto project = [](const std::vector<Vec2f>& poly, const Vec2f& axis) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add comment that this is "Separating axis collision detection"
return {s.x + t * dx1, s.y + t * dy1}; | ||
} | ||
|
||
inline std::vector<Vec2f> convexClip(const std::vector<Vec2f>& subject, const std::vector<Vec2f>& clip) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add comment that this is "Sutherland–Hodgman algorithm"
|
||
inline bool isInside(const Vec2f& edgeStart, const Vec2f& edgeEnd, const Vec2f& point) | ||
{ | ||
return (edgeEnd.x - edgeStart.x) * (point.y - edgeStart.y) - (edgeEnd.y - edgeStart.y) * (point.x - edgeStart.x) <= 0; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it just edgeStart.relaticeCross(edgeEnd, point) < 0
, is'n it?
Vec2f dir = p2 - p1; | ||
for (size_t i = 0, n = poly.size(); i < n; ++i) | ||
{ | ||
Vec2f A = poly[i]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it should be "const Vect2f&" or just "vect2f a=poly[i] - p1"
@@ -4775,6 +4775,40 @@ void BaseMolecule::getBoundingBox(float font_size, LABEL_MODE label_mode, Rect2f | |||
bbox = Rect2f(a, b); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
std::vector<Vec2f> BaseMolecule::getConvexHull(const Vec2f& min_box) const | |||
{ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please add comment that this is "Andrew's monotone chain convex hull algorithm"
{ | ||
float dist = computeConvexDistance(_components[i].second, _components[j].second); | ||
auto& mdi = _mol_distances[i]; | ||
auto it = std::lower_bound(mdi.sorted_distances.begin(), mdi.sorted_distances.end(), std::make_pair(j, dist), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like sorted_distance
used only here.
Do you really need this variable?
for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(_zones.size()); ++i) | ||
{ | ||
auto& zone = _zones[i]; | ||
std::pair<int, std::unordered_set<int>> cur_zone(i, {}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
look like this variable unused
if (doesRayIntersectPolygon(tail_start, *c_it, hull1) && doesRayIntersectPolygon(tail_start, *c_it, hull2)) | ||
return zone1 ? zone1 : current_zone; | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please remove this redundant braces or move break
inside
{ | ||
for (auto& section : cz.second) | ||
{ | ||
if (!(_zones[cz.first].zone_type == ZoneType::EPathWay && section > 1) && it_oz2->second.count(section ^ 1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please add comment to this check?
For me not clear what is verified here.
return result; | ||
} | ||
|
||
std::optional<std::pair<int, int>> ReactionMultistepDetector::findMaxSpecialZone(size_t mol_idx, std::map<int, std::unordered_set<int>>& zones) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could you please add comment that this function search sections intersected with component hull and fill zones with these sections and return max containment section in pair<zone,section>
_moleculeCount = (int)_components.size(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
std::optional<std::pair<int, int>> ReactionMultistepDetector::isMergeable(size_t mol_idx1, size_t mol_idx2, std::optional<std::pair<int, int>> current_zone) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like it should be std::optional<std::pair<int, int>>& current_zone
|
||
auto zone1 = findMaxSpecialZone(mol_idx1, other_zones1); | ||
auto zone2 = findMaxSpecialZone(mol_idx2, other_zones2); | ||
std::set_intersection(other_zones1.begin(), other_zones1.end(), other_zones2.begin(), other_zones2.end(), std::inserter(comm_zones, comm_zones.begin()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think intersection calc better move to line 573
{ | ||
case ZoneType::EPlus: | ||
if ((doesVerticalLineIntersectPolygon(coords[0].x, hull1) && doesVerticalLineIntersectPolygon(coords[0].x, hull2)) || | ||
(doesHorizontalLineIntersectPolygon(coords[0].x, hull1) && doesHorizontalLineIntersectPolygon(coords[0].x, hull2))) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like it should be coord[0].y
as parameter of doesHorizontalLineIntersectPolygon
{ | ||
for (int section1 : sections1) | ||
{ | ||
if (zt == ZoneType::EPathWay && section1 > 1) // pathway has only 2 opposite agents sections |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As you use section index in such way I think better add constants like pathway_sections_count
, pathway_section_top
, pathway_section_bottom
, pathway_max_opposite_section_index
for all types and use it is this function and in zone creating functions like
szd.zone_type = ZoneType::EPathWay;
szd.zone_sections.resize(pathway_sections_count);
szd.zone_sections[pathway_section_top] = top;
szd.zone_sections[pathway_section_bottom] = bottom;
szd.zone_sections[pathway_section_right] = right;
And add comment in constant definition about this loigic
Second option is to store opposite indexes in something like std::map<ZoneType,std::map<std::size_t,std::size_t>>
to make logic more clear
auto c_it = coords.begin(); | ||
const Vec2f& head = *c_it++; | ||
const Vec2f& spine_beg = *c_it++; | ||
const Vec2f& spine_end = *c_it++; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why you use spine_end
? AFAIK spine is vertical so X coordinates of spine_end
and spine_beg
are same.
Generic request
#1234 – issue name