Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to correct math for watt/kilowatt conversion #4816

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: current
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jsnfwlr
Copy link

@jsnfwlr jsnfwlr commented Apr 12, 2025

1kW = 1000 watts
1 ÷ 1000 = 0.001

See Home Assistant Glow config for reference

Checklist:

  • I am merging into next because this is new documentation that has a matching pull-request in esphome as linked above.
    or

  • I am merging into current because this is a fix, change and/or adjustment in the current documentation and is not for a new component or feature.

  • Link added in /components/index.rst when creating new documents for new components or cookbook.

1kW = 1000 watts
1 ÷ 1000 = 0.001
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 12, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the filter configuration for the pulse_meter sensor's total energy reporting in the power meter cookbook. The multiplication factor in the filter has been modified from 0.0001 to 0.001, which increases the reported energy value by a factor of 10. Other filter options and surrounding context remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
cookbook/power_meter.rst Updated pulse_meter sensor filter: multiplication factor changed from 0.0001 to 0.001.

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9cafc27 and 2c2a046.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cookbook/power_meter.rst (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • cookbook/power_meter.rst

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cookbook/power_meter.rst (1)

99-99: Update Multiplier Consistency and Comment Clarity

The multiplication factor has been correctly updated to 0.001 to reflect the conversion (i.e. 1 kW equals 1000 W). However, the inline comment still states (1/10000 pulses per kWh), which may confuse readers regarding the math behind the conversion. Please update the comment to clearly explain the intended conversion, for example, indicating that the factor 0.001 corresponds to dividing by 1000.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ab41aa and 9cafc27.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cookbook/power_meter.rst (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**`: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

**: - Do not generate or add any sequence diagrams

  • cookbook/power_meter.rst

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 12, 2025

Deploy Preview for esphome ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2c2a046
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/esphome/deploys/67f9f9b3d0c99400082c0307
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-4816--esphome.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@nagyrobi
Copy link
Member

That depends on the meter type. There are meters pulsing 10000 times per kWh.

@jsnfwlr
Copy link
Author

jsnfwlr commented Apr 12, 2025

I see. Maybe the change should be to make that more prominent then

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants