Update EIP-7723: Add non-Core EIPs

Merged by EIP-Bot.

EIPS/eip-7723.md

@@ -11,75 +11,83 @@ created: 2024-06-12
 
 ## Abstract
 
-Define the stages that Core EIPs go through in the process of planning network upgrades: `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Considered for Inclusion`, `Scheduled for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion` and `Included`.
+Define the stages that EIPs go through in the process of planning network upgrades: `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Considered for Inclusion`, `Scheduled for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion` and `Included`.
 
 ## Motivation
 
-This EIP proposes definitions for the various stages EIPs go through when planning network upgrades. Specifically, these are: `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Considered for Inclusion`, `Scheduled for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion` and `Included`. It also provides context and guidelines around when and how EIPs should be moved from one stage to the next.
+This EIP proposes definitions for the various stages EIPs go through when planning network upgrades. It also provides context and guidelines around when and how EIPs should be moved from one stage to the next.
 
 ## Specification
 
 The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.
 
-All EIP statuses defined in this EIP only apply within the context of a single network upgrade. In other words, EIPs are `Proposed`, `Considered`, `Declined` and/or `Scheduled` in the context of a specific network upgrade. While an EIP cannot be `Included` in two network upgrades, an EIP being `Declined for Inclusion` in a previous upgrade does not prevent it from being `Proposed`, `Considered`, `Declined` or `Scheduled` for inclusion in any future upgrade. 
+All EIP statuses apply to a single network upgrade. EIPs must be `Proposed`, `Considered`, `Declined` or `Scheduled` separately for each network upgrade. While an EIP cannot be `Included` in two network upgrades, an EIP being `Declined for Inclusion` in a previous upgrade does not prevent it from being `Proposed`, `Considered`, `Declined` or `Scheduled` for inclusion in any future upgrade. 
+
+The statuses below are generally defined for Core EIPs, which must be activated synchronously by all nodes on a network. To help with prioritization and communications, non-Core EIPs may also be assigned these statuses. The differences in the process and implications for non-Core EIPs are noted in each status definition.
 
 ### Upgrade Meta EIPs
 
-When planning a network upgrade, anyone **MAY** draft an Upgrade Meta EIP to list EIPs in various stages of consideration. This Meta EIP **SHOULD** include four categories in its specification section: `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion`, `Considered for Inclusion` and `Scheduled for Inclusion`. Even if a category is empty, it **SHOULD** be included in the initial draft for clarity. 
+Anyone **MAY** draft a Meta EIP to list EIPs for a network upgrade. This Meta EIP **SHOULD** include four categories in its specification section: `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion`, `Considered for Inclusion` and `Scheduled for Inclusion`. Even if a category is empty, it **SHOULD** be included in the initial draft for clarity. 
 
 When the Upgrade Meta EIP is moved to `Last Call`, the `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion` and `Considered for Inclusion` lists **SHOULD** be removed, leaving only `Scheduled for Inclusion`. 
 
 Before the Upgrade Meta EIP is moved to `Final`, the `Scheduled for Inclusion` stage **MUST** be renamed to `Included` and contain only EIPs that were activated in the upgrade. 
 
 ### Upgrade Devnets
 
-When preparing a network upgrade, client developers typically implement EIPs first on an ephemeral test network (upgrade devnet) to verify client interoperability, before deploying to long-lived test networks. These upgrade devnets follow a naming convention of \$upgradeName-devnet-\$version (e.g. pectra-devnet-0 for the first upgrade devnet of the Pectra network upgrade, dencun-devnet-1 for the second upgrade devnet of the Dencun update, etc).
+When preparing a network upgrade, client developers typically implement EIPs first on an ephemeral test network (upgrade devnet) to verify client interoperability, before deploying to long-lived test networks. These upgrade devnets follow a naming convention of `upgradeName-devnet-version` (e.g. `pectra-devnet-0` for the first upgrade devnet of the Pectra network upgrade, `dencun-devnet-1` for the second upgrade devnet of the Dencun update, etc).
 
 Since client developers' ability to include EIPs in a network upgrade is constrained by what can be implemented and tested in these upgrade devnets, the [Considered for Inclusion](#considered-for-inclusion) and [Scheduled for Inclusion](#scheduled-for-inclusion) sections below propose aligning these statuses with EIPs' implementation status in upgrade devnets.
 
 ### Proposed for Inclusion
 
-To formally propose the inclusion of a Core EIP in a network upgrade, someone **MUST** open a pull request against the Upgrade Meta EIP to add the EIP in the `Proposed for Inclusion` section. Reasonable pull requests **SHOULD** be merged in a timely fashion by the Upgrade Meta EIP author.  
+To propose an EIP for inclusion, someone **MUST** open a pull request to add it to the `Proposed for Inclusion` section of the Upgrade Meta EIP. Reasonable pull requests **SHOULD** be merged in a timely fashion by the Upgrade Meta EIP author.  
 
-At this stage, implementation teams **SHOULD** review the EIP in the context of including it in the next upgrade. 
+At this stage, implementation teams **SHOULD** review the EIP. For Core EIPs, this should be in the context of including it in the next upgrade. For non-Core EIPs, this should be in the context of supporting the EIP before the network upgrade is activated. 
 
 Note that EIPs must be `Proposed for Inclusion` for each network upgrade. In other words, proposals do not "carry over" to the next upgrade if an EIP is not included in the one it was first proposed for. 
 
 ### Considered for Inclusion 
 
 Once client developers have reviewed an EIP which was `Proposed for Inclusion`, they **MAY** move it to the `Considered for Inclusion` stage. Once a decision is made by client teams to move an EIP to `Considered for Inclusion`, the Upgrade Meta EIP **SHOULD** be updated to reflect this. 
 
-`Considered for Inclusion` signals that client developers are generally positive towards the EIP. The EIP **SHOULD** be implemented in future Upgrade Devnets. Assuming it meets all the requirements for mainnet deployment it **MAY** be included in the network upgrade. This stage is similar to "concept ACK" in other open source projects, and is not sufficient to result in deployment to mainnet. An EIP **MAY** be moved from `Considered for Inclusion` to `Declined for Inclusion` if client teams are generally against including the EIP in the network upgrade. 
+`Considered for Inclusion` signals that client developers are positive towards the EIP. A Core EIP that is `Considered for Inclusion`  **SHOULD** be implemented in future Upgrade Devnets. Assuming it meets all the requirements for mainnet deployment it **MAY** be included in the network upgrade. This stage is similar to "concept ACK" in other open source projects, and is not sufficient to result in deployment to mainnet. 
+
+Non-Core EIPs that are `Considered for Inclusion` **SHOULD** be supported prior to the network upgrade being activated. 
+
+An EIP **MAY** be moved from `Considered for Inclusion` to `Declined for Inclusion` if client teams are against including the EIP in the network upgrade. 
 
 ### Declined for Inclusion
 
-At any time during the network upgrade planning process, client developers **MAY** move EIPs from any other stage to the `Declined for Inclusion` stage if client teams are generally against including the EIP in the network upgrade. Once a decision is made by client teams to move an EIP to `Declined for Inclusion`, the Upgrade Meta EIP **SHOULD** be updated to reflect this.
+At any time during the network upgrade planning process, client developers **MAY** move EIPs from any other stage to the `Declined for Inclusion` stage if client teams are against including the EIP in the network upgrade. Once a decision is made by client teams to move an EIP to `Declined for Inclusion`, the Upgrade Meta EIP **SHOULD** be updated to reflect this.
 
 `Declined for Inclusion` signals that client developers wish to exclude the EIP from the current network upgrade and stop discussing its potential inclusion or implementation status in relation to this upgrade. An EIP which was `Declined for Inclusion` in a particular upgrade **MAY** still be `Proposed for Inclusion` in a subsequent upgrade. In exceptional circumstances, client developers **MAY** choose to move an EIP from `Declined for Inclusion` to `Considered for Inclusion` or `Scheduled for Inclusion`. 
 
 ### Scheduled for Inclusion 
 
-When client teams agree to implement an EIP in the **next** Upgrade Devnet, the EIP **SHOULD** move to the `Scheduled for Inclusion` stage, and the Upgrade Meta EIP **SHOULD** be updated to reflect this.
+When client teams agree to implement a Core EIP in the **next** Upgrade Devnet, the EIP **SHOULD** move to the `Scheduled for Inclusion` stage, and the Upgrade Meta EIP **SHOULD** be updated to reflect this. Non-Core EIPs **SHOULD** move to `Scheduled for Inclusion` when client teams agree to immediately prioritize their implementation. 
+
+`Scheduled for Inclusion` signals that implementation and testing work are underway. The EIP **SHOULD** be included in the network upgrade if no issues arise. The latest Upgrade Devnet must contain all `Scheduled for Inclusion` Core EIPs.
 
-`Scheduled for Inclusion` signals that implementation and testing work are underway, and that, assuming no issues arise as part of this process, the EIP **SHOULD** be included in the network upgrade. An EIP **MAY** be moved from `Scheduled for Inclusion` to `Declined for Inclusion` if client teams are generally against including the EIP in the network upgrade. An EIP **MAY** also be moved from `Scheduled for Inclusion` to `Considered for Inclusion` if client teams are generally in favor of including the EIP in the network upgrade but cannot commit to including it in the **next** Upgrade Devnet.
+An EIP **MAY** be moved from `Scheduled for Inclusion` to `Declined for Inclusion` if client teams are against including the EIP in the network upgrade. An EIP **MAY** also be moved from `Scheduled for Inclusion` to `Considered for Inclusion` if client teams are in favor of including the EIP in the network upgrade but cannot commit to including it in the **next** Upgrade Devnet.
 
 ### Included
 
-Once a network upgrade has been activated, all EIPs that were part of the upgrade **MUST** be moved to `Included` in the Upgrade Meta EIP, and the `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Considered for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion` and `Scheduled for Inclusion` lists **MUST** be removed from the Meta EIP. 
+After network upgrade activation, all included Core EIPs and activated non-Core EIPs **MUST** be moved to `Included` in the Meta EIP. All other status lists **MUST** be removed from the Meta EIP.
 
 `Included` signals that the EIPs have been activated as part of the network upgrade. 
 
 ## Rationale
 
-Formalizing the `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Considered for Inclusion`, `Scheduled for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion` and `Included` stages provides better legibility to both Ethereum protocol maintainers and the community at large. 
+Formalizing the `Proposed for Inclusion`, `Considered for Inclusion`, `Scheduled for Inclusion`, `Declined for Inclusion` and `Included` stages provides better legibility to both protocol maintainers and the broader Ethereum community.
 
 The specification tries to minimize steps which **MUST** be followed to align with Ethereum's "rough consensus" governance model. 
 
 Assuming it is adopted, the process outlined in this EIP should be used for at least one full network upgrade cycle before moving to `Last Call` and at least two full network upgrades cycles before moving to `Final`. This way, the EIP can be updated to reflect changes made to the process over time. 
 
 ## Backwards Compatibility
 
-This EIP does not directly change the Ethereum protocol. It extends and formalizes the current process of planning network upgrades. 
+This EIP does not directly change the Ethereum protocol. It formalizes parts of the current network upgrade planning process. 
 
 ## Security Considerations