Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add threadid to AsyncStackRootHolder #644
Add threadid to AsyncStackRootHolder #644
Changes from 6 commits
5b2a016
b001c91
d4fc0fe
5511d71
0f2ebe7
1f1289d
8370068
e1b8e25
650c043
9002efa
3b1b1d8
6f28bfe
4f9f5f3
af9b136
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we avoid defining
UNIFEX_SYS_gettid
by just switching here on whetherSYS_gettid
is defined?Also, I'm a bit anxious about the cost of a syscall in each
AsyncStackRoot
constructor since we construct so many of them. Is this a cheap syscall implemented in user space? If so then it doesn't matter, but if it's a typical syscall that transits into kernel space then we should probably revisit capturing this value in theAsyncStackRootHolder
since we'll have one of those per thread and the per-thread value of this is constant.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So I updated this to use the glibc wrapper of gettid because it implements caching (D49174906)
I also spoke to David and his response is that it's difficult to say because it depends on the implementation and we need to profile the code in order to know. This will be used a lot on android and his response is below:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Synced with @ispeters offline and decided to move threadid to async stack root holder for getting the threadid per thread only