As a User I want to be able to use `sp. nov.` and other annotations to detect names, even if they are not known. #143

dimus · 2023-07-17T12:35:23Z

I think it should be an option so we do not create false positives.

This was referenced Jul 17, 2023

As a curator I would like to hit Ammonoencyrtus autone sp. nov. #142

Closed

As a curator I would like finder to hit Alkonia tiquanus sp. nov. #141

Closed

As a developer I would like to see sp.nov. without not return NO_ANNOT #140

Closed

dimus added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2023

optional name detection by annotation (close #143)

b4673a2

dimus added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 27, 2023

optional name detection by annotation (close #143)

7d85860

dimus added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 31, 2023

optional find by nom. annotation (close #143)

e2d4ea1

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

As a User I want to be able to use `sp. nov.` and other annotations to detect names, even if they are not known. #143

As a User I want to be able to use `sp. nov.` and other annotations to detect names, even if they are not known. #143

dimus commented Jul 17, 2023 •

edited

Loading

As a User I want to be able to use sp. nov. and other annotations to detect names, even if they are not known. #143

As a User I want to be able to use sp. nov. and other annotations to detect names, even if they are not known. #143

Comments

dimus commented Jul 17, 2023 • edited Loading

As a User I want to be able to use `sp. nov.` and other annotations to detect names, even if they are not known. #143

As a User I want to be able to use `sp. nov.` and other annotations to detect names, even if they are not known. #143

dimus commented Jul 17, 2023 •

edited

Loading