Skip to content

gpuid-generate-post-workflow.php: Added snippet to delay generation of Unique ID until a workflow step is complete. #1102

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

saifsultanc
Copy link
Contributor

Context

⛑️ Ticket(s): https://secure.helpscout.net/conversation/2931821452/83120

Summary

The Unique ID to be created only after an approval step in Gravity Flow.

Demo:
https://www.loom.com/share/e799e8b4b0984d99a66da79faa34ffee

… of Unique ID until a workflow step is complete.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 9, 2025

Walkthrough

A new PHP class, GPUID_Generate_Post_Workflow, is introduced to integrate Gravity Forms Unique ID generation with Gravity Flow workflow steps. The class defers Unique ID assignment for a form field until a specified workflow step is completed, using WordPress hooks and Gravity Flow actions. An instance is created with configurable IDs.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
gp-unique-id/gpuid-generate-post-workflow.php Added a new class to control when Unique IDs are generated in Gravity Forms, based on workflow steps.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GravityForms
    participant GravityFlow
    participant GPUID_Generate_Post_Workflow

    User->>GravityForms: Submit form
    GravityForms->>GPUID_Generate_Post_Workflow: Trigger gpui_unique_id filter
    GPUID_Generate_Post_Workflow-->>GravityForms: Prevent Unique ID generation (if before workflow step)

    GravityFlow->>GPUID_Generate_Post_Workflow: gravityflow_step_complete (after step)
    GPUID_Generate_Post_Workflow->>GravityForms: Generate and assign Unique ID to entry
Loading

Tip

⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
  • CodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure Review - Disable Cache at either the organization or repository level. If you prefer to disable all data retention across your organization, simply turn off the Data Retention setting under your Organization Settings.

Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 9, 2025

Warnings
⚠️ When ready, don't forget to request reviews on this pull request from your fellow wizards.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against c60d187

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
gp-unique-id/gpuid-generate-post-workflow.php (3)

18-36: Constructor implementation looks good, but consider validating parameter types.

The constructor correctly sets up default values and checks for required parameters. However, there's no validation to ensure that the provided IDs are integers or valid identifiers.

Consider adding type validation like this:

 if ( ! $this->_args['form_id'] || ! $this->_args['field_id'] || ! $this->_args['step_id'] ) {
 	return;
 }

+// Ensure IDs are positive integers
+foreach ( array( 'form_id', 'field_id', 'step_id' ) as $param ) {
+	if ( ! is_numeric( $this->_args[$param] ) || intval( $this->_args[$param] ) <= 0 ) {
+		return;
+	}
+	$this->_args[$param] = intval( $this->_args[$param] );
+}

45-52: Unique ID prevention logic could use stricter comparison operators.

When comparing IDs, it's better to use strict comparison (===) instead of loose comparison (==) to avoid type coercion issues.

-if ( $form_id == $this->_args['form_id'] && $field_id == $this->_args['field_id'] && ! gravity_flow()->is_workflow_detail_page() ) {
+if ( (int) $form_id === $this->_args['form_id'] && (int) $field_id === $this->_args['field_id'] && ! gravity_flow()->is_workflow_detail_page() ) {

1-74: Consider adding error handling and logging for robustness.

While the code handles basic error cases, there's no logging or notification mechanism if something goes wrong (e.g., if the field retrieval fails or if the unique ID couldn't be saved).

Consider adding error handling and possibly logging for robustness:

 public function maybe_generate_unique_id( $step_id, $entry_id, $form_id, $status ) {

 	if ( $step_id == $this->_args['step_id'] && $form_id == $this->_args['form_id'] ) {
 		$entry = GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id );
 		if ( ! is_wp_error( $entry ) && empty( $entry[ $this->_args['field_id'] ] ) ) {
 			$uid_field = GFAPI::get_field( $form_id, $this->_args['field_id'] );
+			if ( ! $uid_field ) {
+				error_log( sprintf( 'GPUID_Generate_Post_Workflow: Could not find field ID %d in form ID %d', $this->_args['field_id'], $form_id ) );
+				return;
+			}
 			$uid_field->save_value( $entry, $uid_field, false );
+			
+			// Verify the unique ID was actually saved
+			$updated_entry = GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id );
+			if ( is_wp_error( $updated_entry ) || empty( $updated_entry[ $this->_args['field_id'] ] ) ) {
+				error_log( sprintf( 'GPUID_Generate_Post_Workflow: Failed to save unique ID for entry ID %d', $entry_id ) );
+			}
 		}
 	}
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3aaf75b and c60d187.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • gp-unique-id/gpuid-generate-post-workflow.php (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
gp-unique-id/gpuid-generate-post-workflow.php (3)

1-17: Well-documented plugin header with clear purpose description.

The header provides comprehensive information about the plugin's purpose, authorship, and includes helpful links to documentation and a demonstration video.


38-43: Hook setup in init method is correct.

The method properly sets up both the filter to prevent ID generation and the action to generate it after a workflow step completes.


67-73: Clear configuration example with helpful comments.

The example configuration is clear and includes helpful comments instructing users to replace the example values with their own.

Comment on lines +54 to +63
public function maybe_generate_unique_id( $step_id, $entry_id, $form_id, $status ) {

if ( $step_id == $this->_args['step_id'] && $form_id == $this->_args['form_id'] ) {
$entry = GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id );
if ( ! is_wp_error( $entry ) && empty( $entry[ $this->_args['field_id'] ] ) ) {
$uid_field = GFAPI::get_field( $form_id, $this->_args['field_id'] );
$uid_field->save_value( GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id ), $uid_field, false );
}
}
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Redundant API call in the maybe_generate_unique_id method.

There's an unnecessary duplicate call to GFAPI::get_entry() at line 60 when you've already retrieved the entry at line 57.

 if ( $step_id == $this->_args['step_id'] && $form_id == $this->_args['form_id'] ) {
 	$entry = GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id );
 	if ( ! is_wp_error( $entry ) && empty( $entry[ $this->_args['field_id'] ] ) ) {
 		$uid_field = GFAPI::get_field( $form_id, $this->_args['field_id'] );
-		$uid_field->save_value( GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id ), $uid_field, false );
+		$uid_field->save_value( $entry, $uid_field, false );
 	}
 }

Also, consider using strict comparison operators here:

-if ( $step_id == $this->_args['step_id'] && $form_id == $this->_args['form_id'] ) {
+if ( (int) $step_id === $this->_args['step_id'] && (int) $form_id === $this->_args['form_id'] ) {
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
public function maybe_generate_unique_id( $step_id, $entry_id, $form_id, $status ) {
if ( $step_id == $this->_args['step_id'] && $form_id == $this->_args['form_id'] ) {
$entry = GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id );
if ( ! is_wp_error( $entry ) && empty( $entry[ $this->_args['field_id'] ] ) ) {
$uid_field = GFAPI::get_field( $form_id, $this->_args['field_id'] );
$uid_field->save_value( GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id ), $uid_field, false );
}
}
}
public function maybe_generate_unique_id( $step_id, $entry_id, $form_id, $status ) {
if ( (int) $step_id === $this->_args['step_id'] && (int) $form_id === $this->_args['form_id'] ) {
$entry = GFAPI::get_entry( $entry_id );
if ( ! is_wp_error( $entry ) && empty( $entry[ $this->_args['field_id'] ] ) ) {
$uid_field = GFAPI::get_field( $form_id, $this->_args['field_id'] );
$uid_field->save_value( $entry, $uid_field, false );
}
}
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant