SQL modelling #24
Draft
SQL modelling #24
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Ban them directly (i.e. ban reads reading different values for apparently no reason) insteads of trying to prevent them indirectly
They were not used anyway (yet)
If a .als model imports a .cat model, convert it to als as necessary
Necessary because we need multiple formulations of serializability
Use the previous sql16_sz_order as the only interpretation
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have an implementation of a lot of the transaction features in SQL, however I'm still missing some things that might be useful, most notably a notion of queries (every event is now considered as it's own "query") and serializable transactions.
I'm leaving this draft PR here as a place to make notes that might be of interest. I'm marking it as draft since I haven't found any interesting executions yet and I also like to add some things (like the weakening we talked about). If you think it should be merged in its current state I'd be happy to unmark it.