Suggest the user to share evalution #27
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications across several fragments and layout files within the application. The Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
app/src/main/res/layout/fragment_success.xml (1)
36-44: LGTM: Button properly configured for new share functionalityThe button's ID and text have been appropriately updated to reflect its new sharing purpose.
Note: The old ID that was replaced had a typo (
evaludateAnotherAppButton→ should have beenevaluateAnotherAppButton). The new IDshareEvaluationis correctly spelled.app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/SuccessFragment.kt (1)
23-23: Move emoji to string resourcesThe emoji text
"\uD83C\uDF89 \uD83E\uDD73"is duplicated in both the layout XML and Kotlin code. Consider moving it to string resources for better maintainability.- mBinding.emoji.text = "\uD83C\uDF89 \uD83E\uDD73" + mBinding.emoji.text = getString(R.string.success_emoji)And in
res/values/strings.xml:<string name="success_emoji">\uD83C\uDF89 \uD83E\uDD73</string>app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/ChooseAppFragment.kt (1)
69-72: Consider extracting bundle keys as constantsWhile the bundle creation is correct, the hardcoded string keys "package" and "name" should be extracted as constants to improve maintainability and prevent typos.
+ companion object { + const val EXTRA_PACKAGE_NAME = "package" + const val EXTRA_APP_NAME = "name" + } private fun onNextButtonClicked() { val bundle = bundleOf( - "package" to mApp?.packageName, - "name" to mApp?.name + EXTRA_PACKAGE_NAME to mApp?.packageName, + EXTRA_APP_NAME to mApp?.name )app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/EvaluateFragment.kt (1)
91-94: Consider extracting argument keys as constantsTo improve maintainability and prevent typos, consider extracting the argument keys as companion object constants.
companion object { const val NOT_EXISTING = -1 + const val ARG_PACKAGE = "package" + const val ARG_NAME = "name" } // Usage in onUploadSuccess: val bundle = bundleOf( - "package" to mPackageName, - "name" to mAppName + ARG_PACKAGE to mPackageName, + ARG_NAME to mAppName )
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/ChooseAppFragment.kt(1 hunks)app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/EvaluateFragment.kt(4 hunks)app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/SuccessFragment.kt(2 hunks)app/src/main/res/layout/fragment_success.xml(1 hunks)app/src/main/res/navigation/nav_graph.xml(1 hunks)app/src/main/res/values-fr/strings.xml(1 hunks)app/src/main/res/values/strings.xml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/src/main/res/navigation/nav_graph.xml (1)
44-49: LGTM: Navigation arguments properly configured
The new arguments package and name are correctly defined and properly typed for passing app information to the success fragment.
app/src/main/res/layout/fragment_success.xml (1)
46-56: LGTM: Share explanation text properly positioned
The new TextView is well-positioned between the thank you message and share button, with proper constraints and resource usage.
app/src/main/res/values-fr/strings.xml (1)
41-41: LGTM!
The French translation is accurate and maintains the intended meaning of encouraging users to share evaluations.
app/src/main/res/values/strings.xml (1)
43-43: LGTM!
The string resource effectively communicates the sharing feature's purpose and aligns with the PR objective.
app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/EvaluateFragment.kt (3)
11-11: LGTM!
The addition of bundleOf import is appropriate for creating bundles in a more Kotlin-idiomatic way.
39-39: LGTM!
The property declaration follows the class's naming conventions and uses appropriate Kotlin modifiers.
96-96: Verify navigation arguments in nav_graph.xml
Ensure that the success fragment's navigation arguments are properly defined in the navigation graph.
✅ Verification successful
Navigation arguments are properly defined and used correctly
The navigation graph (nav_graph.xml) correctly defines both required arguments for the SuccessFragment:
- "package" (String)
- "name" (String)
And the EvaluateFragment correctly passes these arguments in the bundle using the bundleOf() function with matching keys and types.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the navigation arguments are properly defined
rg -A 10 "fragment.*android:name.*SuccessFragment" "app/src/main/res/navigation"
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the navigation graph file
fd "nav.*\.xml" app/src/main/res/
# Then check its content
fd "nav.*\.xml" app/src/main/res/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 2135
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the bundle creation in EvaluateFragment
rg -A 5 "bundle.*=.*Bundle" app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/EvaluateFragment.kt
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire EvaluateFragment file to see how the bundle is created
cat app/src/main/java/com/klee/sapio/ui/view/EvaluateFragment.kt
Length of output: 4070
jonathanklee
force-pushed
the
suggest-share-eval
branch
from
a8ac718 to
1ce2b2d
Compare
jonathanklee
force-pushed
the
suggest-share-eval
branch
from
1ce2b2d to
c7e78cc
Compare
Suggest the user to share evalution
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
UI/UX Improvements
Localization