Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: increment nonce #467

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

feat: increment nonce #467

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

Eikix
Copy link
Member

@Eikix Eikix commented Jan 16, 2025

closes #454

@Eikix Eikix marked this pull request as draft January 16, 2025 17:36
@Eikix
Copy link
Member Author

Eikix commented Jan 16, 2025

Setting to draft to add a check to the nonce, we don't want it to wrap around the prime field but rather error out if it's larger than the max allowed nonce, which seems to be u64.max() in other EVM impls.

@Eikix Eikix marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 10:47
@Eikix Eikix force-pushed the feat/increment_nonce branch from 8129ac2 to b7c097b Compare January 17, 2025 10:51
@Eikix Eikix force-pushed the feat/increment_nonce branch from b7c097b to 2ff10d8 Compare January 17, 2025 11:56
@enitrat
Copy link
Collaborator

enitrat commented Jan 17, 2025

@Eikix I don't understand the comment: what's the blocker? The current version looks good to me.

@Eikix
Copy link
Member Author

Eikix commented Jan 17, 2025

@Eikix I don't understand the comment: what's the blocker? The current version looks good to me.

Comment is out of date, it was before we talked about the validate_transaction

@Eikix Eikix merged commit 32ad5bf into main Jan 17, 2025
4 checks passed
@Eikix Eikix deleted the feat/increment_nonce branch January 17, 2025 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

increment_nonce
2 participants