-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 140
WIP on some CIR → MLIR experiment #1334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
6d3dee3
to
b5a29d4
Compare
80f1134
to
28e0d6b
Compare
e79112e
to
f0632d5
Compare
f0632d5
to
00c9c59
Compare
TODO: integrate support for arbitrary |
Export this function so it can be used by other projects.
This allows the inliner to work with the CIR dialect.
This allows injecting some dialects and patterns to the cir::ConvertCIRToMLIRPass lowering pass.
This allows injecting some dialects and patterns to the cir::direct::ConvertCIRToLLVMPass lowering pass.
Forward the data layout to the type converter. This is not a current solution since it is not possible for now to have a memref of tuple in MLIR yet.
No operation yet. Just lowering to memref<!named_tuple.named_tuple<>> for now.
WIP memref cast operation for NamedTuple hack. The `named_tuple.cast` operation converts a memref of `named_tuple` to a 1D memref of `i8` of the same size to emulate later the struct element access. Example: %0 = named_tuple.cast %alloca_0 : memref<!named_tuple.named_tuple<"s", [i32, i32]>> to memref<8xi8> loc(#loc6)
Emulate the member access through memory for now.
Do not go through a memref of memref.
Arrays in C/C++ have usually a reference semantics and can be lowered to memref. But when inside a class/struct/union, arrays hav a value semantics and can be lowered as tensor.
Remove a shortcut preventing some level of memref recursion.
Export cir::lowerArrayType() so a CIR client can use this function to lower some !cir.array.
Just keep the lowering inside a named_type as a tensor. This fix cir.alloca lowering issue.
Split completely the !cir.array lowering, like in struct/class/union, from any reference with memref construction. Rationalize the approach inside convertToReferenceType() instead of ad-hoc cases all-over the place. Fix a test which seems to have been wrong from the beginning.
Handle pointer strides in quite more contexts. Make the code type-safe with the right memref layouts matching the reinterpret_cast details to avoid tripping the verifiers. This problem was hidden in the past due to the fact that the load/store lowering discarded some intermediate incorrect code for the tested simple cases.
It was removed upstream from mlir::DataLayoutEntryInterface. See: - llvm/llvm-project#128772 - llvm/llvm-project#128754
cir::StructType has been renamed to cir::RecordType.
00c9c59
to
39b162f
Compare
The -emit-mlir syntax has changed and now requires the kind of MLIR to be specified.
The 3 failing tests are because there is an issue in |
Experiment with some CIR → MLIR std dialect lowering.
Not supposed to be merged but useful to get some CI feedback.
This is related to the long running PR Xilinx/mlir-aie#1913
Work-in-progress on CIR→MLIR lowering
This is a huge work-in-progress version adding new features used by
aie++
C++ programming model, such asbetter support for lowering through MLIR standard dialects.
What is experimented here:
tensor
for value semantics (for example instructs) and
memref
for reference semantics (all the other uses);tuple
andthen introducing a new
named_tuple
dialect;memref
flattening and castingcasting;
broader framework;
The output of this new lowering flow has not been tested yet followed by the
MLIR std→LLVMIR.
An issue with
tensor
is that we cannot have random types in atensor
and there is no trait to change this behavior.An alternative design could be to rely on some MLIR std→LLVMIR→MLIR std
back-and-forth traveling in the same module to have some parts of the LLVMIR
dialect to implement some missing features like it is done in the
Polygeist project.
See #1219 for discussions about CIR → MLIR lowering issues.