Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MNTOR-3919: getting setter for churn email state (Part 2) #5480

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Conversation

mansaj
Copy link
Collaborator

@mansaj mansaj commented Jan 9, 2025

References:

Jira: MNTOR-3919
Figma:

Description

These functions will be used by the cronjob to get/set churn email state for a user.

Checklist (Definition of Done)

  • Localization strings (if needed) have been added.
  • All acceptance criteria are met.
  • Jira ticket has been updated (if needed) to match changes made during the development process.
  • Jira ticket has been updated (if needed) with suggestions for QA when this PR is deployed to stage.

@mansaj mansaj changed the title MNTOR-3919-2: getting setter for churn email state MNTOR-3919: getting setter for churn email state (Part 2) Jan 9, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 9, 2025

@mansaj mansaj requested a review from rhelmer January 13, 2025 16:57
Copy link
Collaborator

@rhelmer rhelmer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm although I think @Vinnl asked elsewhere: are we likely to want to do this again? If so, a datestamp might be better than a boolean. If we want to wait and refactor at that time I think it's OK too but worth considering.

@mansaj mansaj changed the base branch from main to MNTOR-3919-1 January 13, 2025 21:22
@mansaj
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mansaj commented Jan 13, 2025

lgtm although I think @Vinnl asked elsewhere: are we likely to want to do this again? If so, a datestamp might be better than a boolean. If we want to wait and refactor at that time I think it's OK too but worth considering.

decided to go with the ts suggestion

Base automatically changed from MNTOR-3919-1 to main January 13, 2025 22:24
@mansaj mansaj merged commit 536da05 into main Jan 13, 2025
16 checks passed
@mansaj mansaj deleted the MNTOR-3919-2 branch January 13, 2025 22:58
Copy link

Cleanup completed - database 'blurts-server-pr-5480' destroyed, cloud run service 'blurts-server-pr-5480' destroyed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants