samples: psa_tls: Fix typo in chip name

[balaji-srin]

The chip name was wrongly mentioned as nRF54L20.
Since this is overlay file for the nRF54L15DK, this needs to be nRF54L15.

[NordicBuilder]

Thank you for your contribution!
It seems you are not a member of the nrfconnect GitHub organization. External contributions are handled as follows:
Large contributions, affecting multiple subsystems for example, may be rejected if they are complex, may introduce regressions due to lack of test coverage, or if they are not consistent with the architecture of nRF Connect SDK.
PRs will be run in our continuous integration (CI) test system.
If CI passes, PRs will be tagged for review and merged on successful completion of review. You may be asked to make some modifications to your contribution during review.
If CI fails, PRs may be rejected or may be tagged for review and rework.
PRs that become outdated due to other changes in the repository may be rejected or rework requested.
External contributions will be prioritized for review based on the relevance to current development efforts in nRF Connect SDK. Bug fix PRs will be prioritized.
You may raise issues or ask for help from our Technical Support team by visiting https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/.

Note: This comment is automatically posted and updated by the Contribs GitHub Action.

[tomi-font]

Thanks!

[degjorva]

Thank you!

[github-actions]

This pull request has been marked as stale because it has been open (more than) 30 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment saying that you would like to have the label removed otherwise this pull request will automatically be closed in 7 days. Note, that you can always re-open a closed pull request at any time.

[NordicBuilder]

CI Information

^{To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above}
Build number: 2

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: 5dead4eadae7a18952fb61a5a66be54751443061

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: 5dead4eadae7a18952fb61a5a66be54751443061
merge base: 4b7980286ec375558d8989529a511ec3c2ccf5f4
target head (main): 4b7980286ec375558d8989529a511ec3c2ccf5f4
Diff

Github labels

Enabled	Name	Description
	ci-disabled	Disable the ci execution
	ci-all-test	Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
	ci-force-downstream	Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
	ci-run-twister	Force run twister
	ci-run-zephyr-twister	Force run zephyr twister

List of changed files detected by CI (1)

samples
│  ├── crypto
│  │  ├── psa_tls
│  │  │  ├── boards
│  │  │  │  │ nrf54l15dk_nrf54l15_cpuapp_ns.conf

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version: acee3b0b2b
Build docker image: docker-dtr.nordicsemi.no/sw-production/ncs-build:acee3b0b2b_bece0367df

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

• ◻️ Toolchain - Skipped: existing toolchain is used
• ✅ Build twister
  • sdk-nrf test count: 423
• ✅ Integration tests
  • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto

Disabled integration tests

• • desktop52_verification
  • doc-internal
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-apps
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-boot
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_mosh
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_positioning
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-proprietary_esb
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-ps
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-thread
  • test-fw-nrfconnect-zigbee
  • test-low-level
  • test-sdk-audio
  • test-sdk-dfu
  • test-sdk-find-my
  • test-sdk-mcuboot
  • test-sdk-pmic-samples
  • test-sdk-sidewalk
  • test-sdk-wifi
  • test-secdom-samples-public

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

[balaji-srin]

@degjorva Will this go in anytime? I see that its marked as stale.

[tomi-font]

Seems like CI hadn't gone through. I rebased your PR and will keep an eye on it to get it in.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud