-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
YAML Updates 3/18/24 #32625
YAML Updates 3/18/24 #32625
Conversation
PR #32625: Size comparison from b6f8e4f to 313ea2d Decreases (2 builds for efr32)
Full report (72 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, k32w, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
PR #32625: Size comparison from 65e6b96 to f92c7a6 Decreases (1 build for efr32)
Full report (66 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
PR #32625: Size comparison from bc9fc76 to e45fe09 Full report (4 builds for cc32xx, mbed, stm32)
|
PR #32625: Size comparison from 774f6c4 to c0eab09 Decreases (3 builds for efr32)
Full report (71 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
PR #32625: Size comparison from 20a55de to 1028489 Full report (70 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, telink)
|
PR #32625: Size comparison from e05d08e to c396319 Full report (61 builds for cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
PR #32625: Size comparison from 5236e27 to fb432f5 Full report (71 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
PR #32625: Size comparison from 43c5d84 to de32db9 Full report (71 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, mbed, nrfconnect, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Allowing manual tests as an exception here as according to @raju-apple this was run manually anyway during SVE, so it is not a 'new test', it just makes it clearer that we do run it.
* Updates Test_TC_S_2_4.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_5.yaml, Test_TC_S_2_6.yaml * Updates Test_TC_CONTENTLAUNCHER_10_4.yaml * Updates Test_TC_DEMM_1_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_WAKEONLAN_1_5.yaml * Updates Test_TC_ALOGIN_12_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_3.yaml * Updates Test_TC_DESC_2_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_EEVSEM_1_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_5.yaml, Test_TC_S_2_6.yaml, Test_TC_S_3_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_ICDM_3_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_G_3_2.yaml * Updates Test_TC_SU_2_3.yaml, Test_TC_SU_2_5.yaml, Test_TC_SU_3_3.yaml Removes Test_TC_SU_4_2.yaml Adds Test_TC_SU_5_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_LWM_2_1.yaml * ts Test_TC_WAKEONLAN_1_5.yaml * Restores Test_TC_WAKEONLAN_1_5.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_5.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_6.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_4.yaml * Removes Test_TC_SU_5_1.yaml * Fix restyle * Trigger CI * Trigger CI * Fix restyle * Fix restyle
* Updates Test_TC_S_2_4.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_5.yaml, Test_TC_S_2_6.yaml * Updates Test_TC_CONTENTLAUNCHER_10_4.yaml * Updates Test_TC_DEMM_1_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_WAKEONLAN_1_5.yaml * Updates Test_TC_ALOGIN_12_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_3.yaml * Updates Test_TC_DESC_2_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_EEVSEM_1_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_5.yaml, Test_TC_S_2_6.yaml, Test_TC_S_3_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_ICDM_3_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_G_3_2.yaml * Updates Test_TC_SU_2_3.yaml, Test_TC_SU_2_5.yaml, Test_TC_SU_3_3.yaml Removes Test_TC_SU_4_2.yaml Adds Test_TC_SU_5_1.yaml * Updates Test_TC_LWM_2_1.yaml * ts Test_TC_WAKEONLAN_1_5.yaml * Restores Test_TC_WAKEONLAN_1_5.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_5.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_6.yaml * Updates Test_TC_S_2_4.yaml * Removes Test_TC_SU_5_1.yaml * Fix restyle * Trigger CI * Trigger CI * Fix restyle * Fix restyle Co-authored-by: Raul Marquez <130402456+raul-marquez-csa@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: C Freeman <cecille@google.com>
Issues covered:
[TC-S-2.4] Test step label has to be updated as per Test Plan project-chip/matter-test-scripts#189
[TC-S-2.5, 2.6] High level PICS has to be updated as per Test Plan project-chip/matter-test-scripts#188
[TC-CONTENTLAUNCHER-10.4] Manual Yaml Script has to be updated as per Verification Step document project-chip/matter-test-scripts#187
[TC-DEMM-1.1] In Step 3 Log has to be updated as per Verification Step Document project-chip/matter-test-scripts#184
[TC-ALOGIN-12.1] - The automated script needs to be updated by removing the comment mentioned before step 1 project-chip/matter-test-scripts#180
[TC-S-2.3] Test case is failing due to the discrepancies in the View Scene and GetSceneMembership Response value. project-chip/certification-tool#477
[TC-DESC-2.1] YAML Manual Script has to be updated as per VS document project-chip/matter-test-scripts#178
[TC-EEVSEM-1.1] In Step 3 Log has to be updated as per Verification Step Document. project-chip/matter-test-scripts#176
[TC-S- 2.5, 2.6, 3.1] Manual YAML Script has to be updated as per Verification Step document project-chip/matter-test-scripts#175
[TC-ICDM-3.1] - Manual Yaml Script has to be updated as per Verification Step document project-chip/matter-test-scripts#174
[TC-G-3.2] GRPKEY.C High level PICS has to be added in the Script project-chip/matter-test-scripts#173
[SU]OTA yaml script needs to be updated as per the test-plan project-chip/matter-test-scripts#163
[TC-LWM-2.1] Script has to be updated as per Test Plan project-chip/matter-test-scripts#117
Tests updated: