-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enabled most unit tests for ESP32 #36626
Conversation
PR #36626: Size comparison from 9d60489 to 251a839 Full report (66 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
PR #36626: Size comparison from 9d60489 to c9301c2 Full report (66 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
PR #36626: Size comparison from 9d60489 to 36b73dc Full report (66 builds for bl602, bl702, bl702l, cc13x4_26x4, cc32xx, cyw30739, efr32, esp32, linux, nxp, psoc6, qpg, stm32, telink, tizen)
|
Are you sure about your PR title? |
Fixed PR title and added description. |
due to this check, the tests will be skipped in the CI. Should we remove that
|
If we want to run the qemu tests on the PR itself, the check should be removed. Also the CI related to QEMU should be tested on this PR before merging this. So , even if we wish to skip the test and run it on espressif/connectedhomeip CI, the changes should specific to QEMU should be tested on this PR. |
I removed the condition, which enabled the two esp32 workflows, and confirmed that this PR does pass CI. Before merging, I can revert it to the previous state (only runs on PRs from esspressif) if that's how we prefer to have it. |
This has been replaced by PR 36738 in order to correct the commit message