[stubtest] temporary --ignore-disjoint-bases flag
#19740
+14
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jorenham
changed the title
--check-disjoint-bases flag--check-disjoint-bases flag
|
Yea, I can see how opt-out would be the path of least resistance here... I guess I'll go for the opt-in approach in the hope that PEP 800 won't be rejected. |
jorenham
force-pushed
the
stubtest--check-disjoint-bases
branch
from
1b416a0 to
3c69535
Compare
jorenham
changed the title
--check-disjoint-bases flag--ignore-disjoint-bases flag
|
I just verified on that the flag works by running this on the numtype numpy stubs (sorry for noise btw, I'll shut up now) |
JelleZijlstra
approved these changes
Aug 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #19737
ref: #19737 (comment)
It's not the prettiest code, but since it will be removed once PEP 800 gets accepted (or rejected), I figured it would be best to keep it simple, so that we can easily revert it.