Skip to content

Conversation

resyntax-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@resyntax-ci resyntax-ci bot commented Jul 20, 2025

Resyntax fixed 20 issues in 4 files.

  • Fixed 11 occurrences of let-to-define
  • Fixed 2 occurrences of define-lambda-to-define
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-let-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of send-chain-to-send+
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of nested-if-to-cond
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of hash-ref-with-constant-lambda-to-hash-ref-without-lambda
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-else-false-to-and
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of for-each-to-for
  • Fixed 1 occurrence of if-begin-to-cond

resyntax-ci bot added 9 commits July 20, 2025 00:12
Using `cond` instead of `if` here makes `begin` unnecessary
`cond` with internal definitions is preferred over `if` with `let`, to reduce nesting
…t-lambda`

The lambda can be removed from the failure result in this `hash-ref` expression.
Internal definitions are recommended instead of `let` expressions, to reduce nesting.
The `define` form supports a shorthand for defining functions.
This `if` expression can be refactored to an equivalent expression using `and`.
This `for-each` operation can be replaced with a `for` loop.
This method chain made of nested `send` expressions can be written more clearly as a `send+` expression.
This `if`-`else` chain can be converted to a `cond` expression.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants