Skip to content

Conversation

BourgoisMickael
Copy link
Contributor

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael commented Aug 25, 2025

To catch errors faster than waiting to run Integration

Note: the commit 788a356 will be reverted once all tests are fixed for S3C

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Aug 25, 2025

Hello bourgoismickael,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Aug 25, 2025

Request integration branches

Waiting for integration branch creation to be requested by the user.

To request integration branches, please comment on this pull request with the following command:

/create_integration_branches

Alternatively, the /approve and /create_pull_requests commands will automatically
create the integration branches.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 25, 2025

❌ 104 Tests Failed:

Tests completed Failed Passed Skipped
20559 104 20455 0
View the top 3 failed test(s) by shortest run time
should return the next truncate list of current versions before a defined date::listLifecycleCurrents with bucket versioning Disabled should return the next truncate list of current versions before a defined date
Stack Traces | 0.001s run time
ifError got unwanted exception: The AWS access key Id you provided does not exist in our records.
should return the non current versions before a defined date::listLifecycleNonCurrents should return the non current versions before a defined date
Stack Traces | 0.001s run time
ifError got unwanted exception: The AWS access key Id you provided does not exist in our records.
should truncate list of current versions before a defined date::listLifecycleCurrents with bucket versioning Disabled should truncate list of current versions before a defined date
Stack Traces | 0.001s run time
ifError got unwanted exception: The AWS access key Id you provided does not exist in our records.

To view more test analytics, go to the Test Analytics Dashboard
📋 Got 3 mins? Take this short survey to help us improve Test Analytics.

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds S3C (Scality Cloud) functional testing configuration to mirror the Integration environment setup. It introduces comprehensive test infrastructure for S3C compatibility testing by creating location configurations, credentials, and CI workflow integration.

Key changes include:

  • S3C location configuration file with multiple data center definitions
  • S3C credentials setup for test accounts (default, lisa, replication)
  • New GitHub Actions workflow job for S3C functional tests with complete test suite execution

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 8 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
tests/locationConfig/locationConfigS3C.json Defines S3C location configurations for multiple data centers and storage classes
tests/functional/aws-node-sdk/lib/json/s3c_credentials.json Provides test credentials for S3C accounts (default, lisa, replication)
.github/workflows/tests.yaml Adds new s3c-ft-tests job with comprehensive functional test execution
.github/docker/setup-s3c.sh Script to configure S3C environment and accounts matching Integration setup
.github/docker/md-config-v0.json Metadata configuration for S3C testing environment
.github/docker/docker-compose.sse.yaml Extends Docker Compose with metadata-standalone service and S3C location config
.github/docker/config.s3c.json Main S3C configuration file with endpoints, services, and feature settings
.github/actions/setup-ci/action.yaml Adds S3C-specific hostname mapping for website endpoints

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

@BourgoisMickael BourgoisMickael force-pushed the improvement/CLDSRV-717-s3c-tests-setup branch from 59bcce7 to 788a356 Compare August 25, 2025 13:32
Copy link
Contributor

@anurag4DSB anurag4DSB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want to deploy vault as well if we want to do it like integration?

Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Copy link
Contributor

@tcarmet tcarmet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pretty awesome call into executing this testsuite here 👌

I have to state though that the setup is starting to look a bit similar to a workbench setup. I don't think workbench have all the necessary config capabilities/code to make it equal, but I think it's worth you having a quick look at it, and share some thoughts onto which direction we should go to eventually add those capabilities in.

echo "Copying s3c credentials to mem credentials"
cp \
$SCRIPT_DIR/../../tests/functional/aws-node-sdk/lib/json/s3c_credentials.json \
$SCRIPT_DIR/../../tests/functional/aws-node-sdk/lib/json/mem_credentials.json
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this file supposed to be added in the .gitignore?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No this is executed in the CI

--canonicalid 79a59df900b949e55d96a1e698fbacedfd6e09d98eacf8f8d5218e7cd47ef2be
$VAULTCLIENT --config $CONFIG generate-account-access-key \
--name Bart \
--accesskey ACC1AK00000000000000 \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we are specifying those credentials in s3c_credentials.json should we read from it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not necessarily, I've hardcoded here so we can easily rerun manually and quickly troubleshoot without having to look for creds. Same for Integration, it will be hardcoded

@BourgoisMickael
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we want to deploy vault as well if we want to do it like integration?

@anurag4DSB Yes vault is deployed as well (the latest version with node 22)

@BourgoisMickael
Copy link
Contributor Author

/create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Aug 25, 2025

Integration data created

I have created the integration data for the additional destination branches.

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8

You can set option create_pull_requests if you need me to create
integration pull requests in addition to integration branches, with:

@bert-e create_pull_requests

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Aug 25, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

The following options are set: create_integration_branches

@BourgoisMickael
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Aug 26, 2025

Build failed

The build for commit did not succeed in branch w/9.1/improvement/CLDSRV-717-s3c-tests-setup

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Aug 26, 2025

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

  • Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
    current queue is merged.
  • Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve, create_integration_branches

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Aug 26, 2025

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.0

  • ✔️ development/9.1

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-717.

Goodbye bourgoismickael.

@bert-e bert-e merged commit 6c0f19d into development/9.0 Aug 26, 2025
42 of 49 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/CLDSRV-717-s3c-tests-setup branch August 26, 2025 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants