Skip to content

Conversation

jovial
Copy link
Contributor

@jovial jovial commented Aug 22, 2025

No description provided.

@jovial jovial requested a review from a team as a code owner August 22, 2025 16:44
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @jovial, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request prepares for the upcoming 0.5.4 release by updating the version number in the galaxy.yml configuration file. This is a standard step in the release process, ensuring that the collection's metadata reflects the new version.

Highlights

  • Version Update: The galaxy.yml file has been updated to increment the collection version from 0.5.3 to 0.5.4.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly bumps the version to 0.5.4 in galaxy.yml for the upcoming release. However, it appears to be missing the corresponding update to the CHANGELOG.rst file. Maintaining an up-to-date changelog is crucial for communicating changes to users, and it's a standard part of the release process. I've added a comment with a suggestion to include this update.

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
namespace: stackhpc
name: openstack
version: 0.5.3
version: 0.5.4

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While the version bump to 0.5.4 is correct, a corresponding entry in CHANGELOG.rst appears to be missing. To ensure users are aware of the changes in this release, please add a new section for v0.5.4 to CHANGELOG.rst.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants