Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: test using apps #1130

Open
wants to merge 123 commits into
base: 10.1
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix: test using apps #1130

wants to merge 123 commits into from

Conversation

sattvikc
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary of change

(A few sentences about this PR)

Related issues

  • Link to issue1 here
  • Link to issue1 here

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your
changes work. Bonus points for screenshots and videos!)

Documentation changes

(If relevant, please create a PR in our docs repo, or create a checklist here
highlighting the necessary changes)

Checklist for important updates

  • Changelog has been updated
    • If there are any db schema changes, mention those changes clearly
  • coreDriverInterfaceSupported.json file has been updated (if needed)
  • pluginInterfaceSupported.json file has been updated (if needed)
  • Changes to the version if needed
    • In build.gradle
  • If added a new paid feature, edit the getPaidFeatureStats function in FeatureFlag.java file
  • Had installed and ran the pre-commit hook
  • If there are new dependencies that have been added in build.gradle, please make sure to add them
    in implementationDependencies.json.
  • Update function getValidFields in io/supertokens/config/CoreConfig.java if new aliases were added for any core
    config (similar to the access_token_signing_key_update_interval config alias).
  • Issue this PR against the latest non released version branch.
    • To know which one it is, run find the latest released tag (git tag) in the format vX.Y.Z, and then find the
      latest branch (git branch --all) whose X.Y is greater than the latest released tag.
    • If no such branch exists, then create one from the latest released branch.
  • If added a foreign key constraint on app_id_to_user_id table, make sure to delete from this table when deleting
    the user as well if deleteUserIdMappingToo is false.
  • If added a new recipe, then make sure to update the bulk import API to include the new recipe.

Remaining TODOs for this PR

  • Item1
  • Item2

@sattvikc sattvikc self-assigned this Mar 25, 2025
@sattvikc sattvikc requested a review from tamassoltesz April 7, 2025 12:01
@@ -226,7 +229,7 @@ public void shouldProcessBulkImportUsersInLargeNumbersInTheSameTenant() throws E
List<BulkImportUser> users = generateBulkImportUser(usersCount);
BulkImport.addUsers(appIdentifier, storage, users);

waitForProcessingWithTimeout(appIdentifier, storage, 300); // 5 minutes
waitForProcessingWithTimeout(appIdentifier, storage, 600); // 10 minutes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did you increase the wait time here? GHA runs these slower?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yea, giving more time for the GHA to succeed

Copy link
Contributor

@tamassoltesz tamassoltesz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I played around with your branch and reviewed the changes that are related to the core test running (so no GHA, as those are seemingly changing at the moment of writing this), the conclusion is: I like the idea and agree with the implementation. I didn't catch any mistake by review, however, when running tests locally I have failing tests. I suspect that's on my docker env, but I'm not entirely sure.
(The symptoms are mostly SocketReadTimeOut, as if the communication with the container had been halted or something.
Please ask at least one more dev to test these changes on the local machine both with startTestEnv and with idea (or any other IDE he is using).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants