Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(sdf, dal): Cleanup old pre-REBAC routes #5247

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stack72
Copy link
Contributor

@stack72 stack72 commented Jan 14, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added A-sdf Area: Primary backend API service [Rust] A-dal A-web labels Jan 14, 2025
Copy link

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails

Scanned Files

path: () => "/change_set/begin_abandon_approval_process",
force_apply: {
path: (vars: ROUTE_VARS) =>
`/v2/workspaces/${vars.workspaceId}/change-sets/${vars.changeSetId}/force_apply`,
method: "POST",
},
begin_approval_process: {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we using this still? or can this one get cleaned up?

Way back when, I was considering keeping the low-fi approval flow for things like 'abandon change set' (as it gives people who are on the change set a chance to stop the abandon if they're actively doing something) but wasn't totally sure...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do see that an endpoint still is called so I left it in place - it's when the user is an approver or an owner and they force their own approval

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry bad github comment location - I meant the begin_approval_process pieces

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely not for this PR - just leaving a note that we need to update both this client and the tests to account for views when we clean up that feature flag

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-dal A-sdf Area: Primary backend API service [Rust] A-web
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants