Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates AWS managed policies #1162

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

Updates AWS managed policies #1162

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

udondan
Copy link
Owner

@udondan udondan commented Feb 25, 2025

Updates AWS managed policies

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Refined cross-account permission matching to ensure more accurate and secure permission validation.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Walkthrough

The update modifies the AWS Lake Formation cross-account manager policy. The condition in the policy statement for ram:PermissionArn has been changed from "StringLike" to "ArnLike", shifting the evaluation from standard string pattern matching to an ARN-specific approach. The list of ARNs targeted remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/.../AWSLakeFormationCrossAccountManager.json Updated the condition key for ram:PermissionArn from "StringLike" to "ArnLike".

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ac671e0 and d18ef8b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/source/_static/managed-policies/AWSLakeFormationCrossAccountManager.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Test cdk-iam-floyd
  • GitHub Check: Automerge CI
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/source/_static/managed-policies/AWSLakeFormationCrossAccountManager.json (2)

47-53: Update to ARN Matching in Policy Condition

The change from "StringLike" to "ArnLike" for the "ram:PermissionArn" condition ensures that the policy now evaluates ARNs with ARN-specific semantics rather than using generic string matching. This aligns well with AWS best practices for handling Amazon Resource Names in managed policies.


1-79: Overall Policy Structure Validity

The JSON policy structure is intact and follows the standard AWS policy document format. There are no apparent syntax errors, and the other conditions and statements remain consistent with AWS guidelines.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@udondan udondan merged commit 09526a2 into main Feb 25, 2025
9 checks passed
@udondan udondan deleted the update-aws-managed-policies branch February 25, 2025 01:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant