-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test(codecs): add missing assert in codec decoding tests #20998
test(codecs): add missing assert in codec decoding tests #20998
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you @jorgehermo9
Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: 29f69aef-c277-4520-94f1-ec1f71d31f18 Metrics dashboard Baseline: 210ff09 Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | +27.00 | [+18.79, +35.21] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | +27.00 | [+18.79, +35.21] | |
➖ | syslog_humio_logs | ingress throughput | +4.09 | [+3.98, +4.20] | |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics | ingress throughput | +3.67 | [+3.56, +3.78] | |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics | ingress throughput | +1.84 | [+1.71, +1.96] | |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks | ingress throughput | +1.17 | [+1.02, +1.32] | |
➖ | splunk_hec_route_s3 | ingress throughput | +1.11 | [+0.79, +1.44] | |
➖ | http_text_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +0.95 | [+0.83, +1.07] | |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs | ingress throughput | +0.95 | [+0.75, +1.15] | |
➖ | syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics | ingress throughput | +0.51 | [+0.37, +0.65] | |
➖ | http_to_http_acks | ingress throughput | +0.43 | [-0.89, +1.76] | |
➖ | socket_to_socket_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.31 | [+0.25, +0.37] | |
➖ | fluent_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | +0.29 | [-0.21, +0.78] | |
➖ | syslog_loki | ingress throughput | +0.15 | [+0.09, +0.21] | |
➖ | http_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +0.10 | [+0.03, +0.17] | |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.05, +0.12] | |
➖ | http_to_http_noack | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.02, +0.02] | |
➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.11, +0.11] | |
➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.11, +0.11] | |
➖ | splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.10, +0.07] | |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks | ingress throughput | -0.05 | [-0.15, +0.06] | |
➖ | syslog_splunk_hec_logs | ingress throughput | -0.29 | [-0.37, -0.22] | |
➖ | otlp_http_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.30 | [-0.44, -0.16] | |
➖ | http_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -0.45 | [-0.59, -0.30] | |
➖ | otlp_grpc_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.49 | [-0.61, -0.37] | |
➖ | http_to_s3 | ingress throughput | -0.57 | [-0.84, -0.30] | |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole | ingress throughput | -0.78 | [-0.87, -0.69] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
The tests in the auto-merge queue failed but I can't understand why 🤔 |
Ah, sorry, I meant to drop a note. The failure is unrelated (it should be fixed by #21009 ). |
Regression Detector ResultsRun ID: a8d57413-4390-49e0-b39c-0e2ba0f160e8 Metrics dashboard Baseline: 8a77d7c Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | +0.32 | [-6.27, +6.90] |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole | ingress throughput | +3.03 | [+2.89, +3.16] | |
➖ | splunk_hec_route_s3 | ingress throughput | +1.24 | [+0.91, +1.58] | |
➖ | fluent_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | +1.14 | [+0.63, +1.64] | |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.08 | [+0.91, +1.24] | |
➖ | http_to_s3 | ingress throughput | +0.93 | [+0.66, +1.20] | |
➖ | otlp_grpc_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.37 | [+0.25, +0.48] | |
➖ | file_to_blackhole | egress throughput | +0.32 | [-6.27, +6.90] | |
➖ | socket_to_socket_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.27 | [+0.20, +0.34] | |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks | ingress throughput | +0.26 | [+0.08, +0.44] | |
➖ | http_to_http_noack | ingress throughput | +0.23 | [+0.13, +0.32] | |
➖ | syslog_splunk_hec_logs | ingress throughput | +0.20 | [+0.09, +0.30] | |
➖ | http_text_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +0.18 | [+0.04, +0.33] | |
➖ | otlp_http_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.07 | [-0.07, +0.20] | |
➖ | http_to_http_json | ingress throughput | +0.05 | [+0.00, +0.10] | |
➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack | ingress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.08, +0.13] | |
➖ | splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.06, +0.10] | |
➖ | splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.10, +0.10] | |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks | ingress throughput | -0.06 | [-0.22, +0.10] | |
➖ | syslog_loki | ingress throughput | -1.50 | [-1.58, -1.43] | |
➖ | syslog_humio_logs | ingress throughput | -1.76 | [-1.88, -1.63] | |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics | ingress throughput | -1.88 | [-1.99, -1.76] | |
➖ | http_to_http_acks | ingress throughput | -1.89 | [-3.19, -0.59] | |
➖ | syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics | ingress throughput | -2.39 | [-2.59, -2.19] | |
➖ | http_elasticsearch | ingress throughput | -2.40 | [-2.57, -2.23] | |
➖ | datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs | ingress throughput | -2.97 | [-3.17, -2.78] | |
➖ | syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics | ingress throughput | -3.99 | [-4.15, -3.84] |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
aab836b
…v#20998) test: fix missing assert
…v#20998) test: fix missing assert
Found a missing assert in a test that was done by myself.
the
matches
macro does not panic if the pattern does not match, it just returns false.