Skip to content

Docs: Remove duplicate fenced code block example #79470

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: canary
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ryanjbonnell
Copy link

On the How to use Server and Client Components page in the Getting Started Guide, there appears to be a duplicate code example in the Reducing JS bundle size section:

'use client'
 
export default function Search() {
  // ...
}

This pull request simply deletes the duplicate code block (appearing below):

Screenshot 2025-05-21 at 11 36 17 AM

@ijjk ijjk added the Documentation Related to Next.js' official documentation. label May 21, 2025
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 21, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 3a4c90d

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented May 21, 2025

Allow CI Workflow Run

  • approve CI run for commit: 3a4c90d

Note: this should only be enabled once the PR is ready to go and can only be enabled by a maintainer

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Related to Next.js' official documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants